Citation network
Brower Vs. County of Inyo
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 21, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brower v. CountySearch
-
of Inyo - 489 U.S. 593 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Brower v. CountySearch
-
of Inyo, 489 U.S. 593 (1989) Brower v. CountySearch
-
and the contrary holding Page 489 U. S. 595 of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Jamieson v. ShawSearch
-
In Tennessee v. GarnerSearch
-
of a police chase in which the suspect unexpectedly loses control of his car and crashes. See Galas v. McKeeSearch
-
control. A seizure occurs even when an unintended person or thing is the object of the detention or taking, see Hill v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Maryland v. GarrisonSearch
-
The writs of assistance that were the principal grievance against which the Fourth Amendment was directed, see Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
Boyd, supra, at 116 U. S. 626 (discussing Entick v. CarringtonSearch
-
Byars v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
the suspect's freedom of movement would have been a seizure. This analysis is reflected by our decision in Hester v. UnitedSearch
-
s action only if, taking the allegations of the complaint in the light most favorable to petitioners, see Scheuer v. RhodesSearch
-
See Conley v. GibsonSearch
-
a police car pursuing with flashing lights, or to a policeman in the road signaling an oncoming car to halt, see Kibbe v. SpringfieldSearch
-
the barrier, but we do not think it practicable to conduct such an inquiry into subjective intent. See United States v. LeonSearch
-
Anderson v. CreightonSearch
-
though responsible for depriving him of his freedom of movement, would not be liable for his death. See Martinez v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Cameron v. PontiacSearch
-
at 489 U. S. 598 . This, of course, not only comports with the recent trend in our cases, see, e.g., Harlow v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
INS v. DelgadoSearch
-
in Judge Pregerson's dissent in the Court of Appeals, this case is plainly controlled by our decision in Tennessee v. GarnerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Brower v. CountySearch
-
Jamieson v. ShawSearch
-
See Galas v. McKeeSearch
-
Hill v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Maryland v. GarrisonSearch
-
Boyd v. UnitedSearch
-
Entick v. CarringtonSearch
-
Hester v. UnitedSearch
-
Kibbe v. SpringfieldSearch
-
See United States v. LeonSearch
-
Anderson v. CreightonSearch
-
See Martinez v. CaliforniaSearch
-
Tennessee v. GarnerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial