Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Commissioner Vs. Clark

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 22, 1989

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

34 entries 34 unlinked
Show
  1. U.S. 726 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Commissioner v. Clark
    Search
  2. U.S. 726 (1989) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Clark
    Search
  3. cash payment in exchange for a portion of his stock was taxable as a dividend. In the two earlier cases, Commissioner v. Estate
    Search
  4. of Bedford, 325 U. S. 283 (1945), and United States v. Davis
    Search
  5. Id. at 140. Under the test advocated by the Commissioner and given voice in Shimberg v. United
    Search
  6. The second test, urged by the taxpayer and finding support in Wright v. United
    Search
  7. by the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is in conflict with the decision of the Fifth Circuit in Shimberg v. United
    Search
  8. see, e.g., Rev.Rul. 75-447, 1975-2 Cum.Bull. 113, and that we have expressly sanctioned, see Minnesota Tea Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  9. Commissioner v. Court
    Search
  10. we usually read the exception narrowly in order to preserve the primary operation of the provision. See Phillips, Inc. v. Walling
    Search
  11. merely 'a continuance of the proprietary interests in the continuing enterprise under modified corporate form.' Lewis v. Commissioner
    Search
  12. United States v. Davis
    Search
  13. equivalency' is whether the distribution is proportionate to the shareholders' stock interests ( United States v. Davis
    Search
  14. distribution is a 'meaningful reduction of the shareholder's proportionate interest in the corporation.' United States v. Davis
    Search
  15. developed as a result of some imprecise language in our decision in Commissioner v. Estate
    Search
  16. See Rev.Rul. 56-220, 1956-1 Cum.Bull.191. Commentators, see, e.g., Darrel, The Scope of Commissioner v. Bedford
    Search
  17. The Blunt Toe of the Automatic Rule, 20 Tax L.Rev. 573 (1965), and courts, see, e.g., Hawkinson v. Commissioner
    Search
  18. Idaho Power Co. v. United
    Search
  19. reorganizations) that involve the exchange of stock or securities solely for other stock or securities. See Paulsen v. Commissioner
    Search
  20. to Clark had the effect of a distribution of a dividend. We supplied the straightforward answer in United States v. Davis
    Search
  21. U.S. Supreme Court Commissioner v. Clark
    Search
  22. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Clark
    Search
  23. Commissioner v. Estate
    Search
  24. and United States v. Davis
    Search
  25. Shimberg v. United
    Search
  26. Wright v. United
    Search
  27. Minnesota Tea Co. v. Helvering
    Search
  28. See Phillips, Inc. v. Walling
    Search
  29. Lewis v. Commissioner
    Search
  30. United States v. Davis
    Search
  31. Darrel, The Scope of Commissioner v. Bedford
    Search
  32. Hawkinson v. Commissioner
    Search
  33. Idaho Power Co. v. United
    Search
  34. See Paulsen v. Commissioner
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial