Citation network
Board of Estimate of Nyc Vs. Morris
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 22, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 688 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Board of Estimate of NYC v. MorrisSearch
-
U.S. 688 (1989) Board of Estimate of City of New York v. MorrisSearch
-
which concluded that the board was a nonelective, nonlegislative body not subject to the rule established by Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
its members ultimately are chosen by popular vote. On remand, the District Court determined that applying the Abate v. MundtSearch
-
F.Supp. 652 (EDNY 1982), on the ground that the board was not subject to the rule established by Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
U. S. 533 (1964), its companion cases, and its progeny, such as Abate v. MundtSearch
-
Bifurcating the proceedings, the District Court determined, first, that applying this Court's methodology in Abate v. MundtSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
F.2d 384 (CA2 1987). Tracing the imperative of each citizen's equal power to elect representatives from Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
to Abate v. MundtSearch
-
extends not only to congressional districting plans, see Wesberry v. SandersSearch
-
U. S. 1 (1964), not only to state legislative districting, see Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
supra, but also to local government apportionment. Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
local, elected officials, suffices to insulate the latter from the standard of substantial voter equality. See Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
County, supra, at 390 U. S. 481 . This was confirmed in Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
of the legislative bodies of the Nation, State, or locality, as the case may be. Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
to require that elections to the body comply with equal protection strictures. See Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
we have once before, although in a different context, declined to accept the approach now urged by the city. Whitcomb v. ChavisSearch
-
that, in terms of assuring fair and effective representation, the equal protection approach reflected in the Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
the board, each with a single vote. Applying the formula that we have utilized without exception since 1971, see Abate v. MundtSearch
-
could ever be justified. See Brown v. ThomsonSearch
-
Together with No. 87-1112, Ponterio v. MorrisSearch
-
analysis in this context focuses on representation of people, not political or economic interests. See, e.g., Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Appellees point out that, in Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
the issue before the Court was whether our decision in Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
Fair Representation v. TawesSearch
-
Lucas v. Forty-FourthSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Board of Estimate of NYC v. MorrisSearch
-
Board of Estimate of City of New York v. MorrisSearch
-
the Abate v. MundtSearch
-
Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
See Avery v. MidlandSearch
-
Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
See Hadley v. JuniorSearch
-
the Reynolds v. SimsSearch
-
See Brown v. ThomsonSearch
-
Ponterio v. MorrisSearch
-
Fair Representation v. TawesSearch
-
Gaffney v. CummingsSearch
-
Mahan v. HowellSearch
-
Whitcomb v. ChavisSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial