Citation network
Lauro Lines Vs. Chasser
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 22, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 495 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Lauro Lines v. ChasserSearch
-
U.S. 495 (1989) Lauro Lines v. ChasserSearch
-
did not fall within the exception to the rule of nonappealability carved out for collateral final orders in Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Rohrer, Hibler & Replogle, Inc. v. PerkinsSearch
-
Sterling Forest Associates, Ltd. v. Barnett-RangeSearch
-
Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Frazier-ParrottSearch
-
Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
U. S. 517 , 486 U. S. 521 (1988), quoting Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. MayacamasSearch
-
Midland Asphalt Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 424 , 472 U. S. 431 (1985), quoting Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Midland Asphalt Corp., supra, at 489 U. S. 798 , quoting United States v. MacDonaldSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
right not to be tried is effectively unreviewable after final judgment, and is immediately appealable. Helstoski v. MeanorSearch
-
Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
to dismiss based upon a claim of absolute immunity from suit is immediately appealable prior to final judgment, Nixon v. FitzgeraldSearch
-
against the defendant is not properly before the particular court because it lacks jurisdiction. In Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
from suit -- even though service was essential to the trial court's jurisdiction over the defendant. See also Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
that there is a strong federal policy favoring the enforcement of foreign forum-selection clauses, citing The Bremen v. ZapataSearch
-
has always been a significant part of our collateral order doctrine. When first formulating that doctrine in Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
U. S. 546 (emphasis added). Our later cases have retained that significant requirement. For example, in Abney v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 658 (emphasis added), quoting Cohen, supra, at 431 U. S. 546 . And in Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Id. at 437 U. S. 468 (emphasis added). See also Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. MercurySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lauro Lines v. ChasserSearch
-
Cohen v. BeneficialSearch
-
Catlin v. UnitedSearch
-
Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySearch
-
Helstoski v. MeanorSearch
-
In Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSearch
-
The Bremen v. ZapataSearch
-
United States v. MacDonaldSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial