Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Gomez Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 12, 1989

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

81 entries 9 linked 72 unlinked
Show
  1. United States Vs. Rumely US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1953
  2. Crowell Vs. Benson US Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1932
  3. Mathews Vs. Weber US Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1976
  4. Witherspoon Vs. Illinois US Supreme Court · Jun 03, 1968
  5. Gray Vs. Mississippi US Supreme Court · May 18, 1987
  6. United States Vs. Garcia US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1859
  7. United States Vs. Raddatz US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1980
  8. Ricketts Vs. Adamson US Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1987
  9. Wingo Vs. Wedding US Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1974
  10. Gomez v. United
    Search
  11. States - 490 U.S. 858 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Gomez v. United
    Search
  12. States, 490 U.S. 858 (1989) Gomez v. United
    Search
  13. they are specifically enumerated in the Act, define the attributes of the magistrate's office. See, e.g., Mathews v. Weber
    Search
  14. dire examination and jury selection. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals rejected this argument. United States v. Garcia
    Search
  15. The Second Circuit's decision conflicts with the holding of the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Ford
    Search
  16. a reasonable alternative interpretation poses no constitutional question. See, e.g., Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor
    Search
  17. additional duties clause readily may be deduced from the context of the overall statutory scheme. Cf. Massachusetts v. Morash
    Search
  18. quoting Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. Dedeaux
    Search
  19. Richards v. United
    Search
  20. authorization in the statute reasonably should bear some relation to the specified duties. Thus, in United States v. Raddatz
    Search
  21. and Wingo v. Wedding
    Search
  22. trial does not commence for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause until the jury is empaneled and sworn, Serfass v. United
    Search
  23. U.S. 377, 420 U. S. 388 (1975), other constitutional rights attach before that point, see, e.g., Brewer v. Williams
    Search
  24. Lewis v. United
    Search
  25. States, 146 U. S. 370 , 146 U. S. 374 (1892) (quoting Hopt v. Utah
    Search
  26. U. S. 574 , 110 U. S. 578 (1884)). See Swain v. Alabama
    Search
  27. Ricketts v. Adamson
    Search
  28. may enforce a defendant's right to be tried by a jury free from ethnic, racial, or political prejudice, Rosales-Lopez v. United
    Search
  29. States, 451 U. S. 182 , 451 U. S. 188 (1981), Ham v. South
    Search
  30. Carolina, 409 U. S. 524 (1973), Dennis v. United
    Search
  31. States, 339 U. S. 162 (1950), or predisposition about the defendant's culpability, Irvin v. Dowd
    Search
  32. words but also gestures and attitudes of all participants to ensure the jury's impartiality. See, e.g., Wainwright v. Witt
    Search
  33. U. S. 412 , 469 U. S. 428 , n. 9 (1985) (quoting Reynolds v. United
    Search
  34. Cf. Waller v. Georgia
    Search
  35. us that Congress Page 490 U. S. 876 did not intend the additional duties clause to embrace this function. V The
    Search
  36. during jury selection may be grounds for reversal of a conviction. Brief for United States 44, n. 41 (citing Batson v. Kentucky
    Search
  37. U. S. 648 , 481 U. S. 668 (1987) (quoting Chapman v. California
    Search
  38. Together with No. 88-5158, Chavez-Tesina v. United
    Search
  39. ed. and Supp. V). United States v. Garcia
    Search
  40. Garcia, 848 F.2d at 1338 (Oakes, J.). Cf. United States v. Ford
    Search
  41. Ford, while two Ninth Circuit opinions decide the issue much as the Second Circuit did below. Compare United States v. Trice
    Search
  42. F.2d 1421 (CA8 1988), with United States v. Peacock
    Search
  43. United States v. Bezold
    Search
  44. F.2d 999 (CA9 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1063 (1986). See also United States v. Rodriguez-Suarez
    Search
  45. Appeals have rejected challenges to a magistrate's presiding over jury selection on procedural grounds. United States v. Rivera-Sola
    Search
  46. United States v. DeFiore
    Search
  47. F.2d 757 (CA2 1983) (failure to object), cert. denied sub nom. Coppola v. United
    Search
  48. Chromalloy American Corp., Federal Malleable Div. v. Marshall
    Search
  49. Brief for Petitioner in Mathews v. Weber
    Search
  50. In part, Congress intended to overturn judicial opinions limiting the scope of the Act, including Wingo v. Wedding
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial