Citation network
Quinn Vs. Millsap
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 15, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 95 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Quinn v. MillsapSearch
-
U.S. 95 (1989) Quinn v. MillsapSearch
-
A land-ownership requirement for appointment to the board of freeholders violates the Equal Protection Clause, Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
Chappelle v. GreaterSearch
-
to serve on the board that was to consider proposals for reorganizing the St. Louis city and county governments. Quinn v. MissouriSearch
-
Ibid. Relying on this Court's decisions in Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
U. S. 346 (1970), and Chappelle v. GreaterSearch
-
on the merits. First, in an effort to rely on the adequate and independent state ground doctrine, see Fox Film Corp. v. MullerSearch
-
Zacchini v. Scripps-HowardSearch
-
precludes review of the equal protection issue -- was expressly rejected in Baker v. CarrSearch
-
Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. WallaceSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
ASARCO Inc. v. KadishSearch
-
U. S. 605 (1989). Indeed, in Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
to order executive officials to make discretionary appointments in a particular way. See Mayor of Philadelphia v. EducationalSearch
-
Carter v. JurySearch
-
would contradict principles laid down in the Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73, 85, and settled since Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
Satisfied of our jurisdiction over this appeal, we turn to the merits. III A In Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
to strike down a requirement of local property ownership for membership on a local airport commission. Chappelle v. GreaterSearch
-
S.W.2d. at 594. The Missouri Supreme Court, instead, turned to our decisions in Ball v. JamesSearch
-
U. S. 355 (1981), Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
Lake Basin Water Storage Dist., 410 U. S. 719 (1973), and Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. ToltecSearch
-
the issue throughout this litigation, first in federal court, then in state court, and now in this Court. Cf. Revere v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Minnesota v. CloverSearch
-
Indeed, there already has been an adjudication of the merits of this issue by the United States District Court. Quinn v. MissouriSearch
-
of the court's reliance on an alternative state law holding. See Michigan v. LongSearch
-
when used elsewhere in the Missouri Constitution, carries its usual meaning of land ownership. See, e.g., Shively v. LankfordSearch
-
Quinn v. MissouriSearch
-
we need not consider appellants' argument that a strict standard of review applies by virtue of such cases as Bullock v. CarterSearch
-
U. S. 134 (1972), and Lubin v. PanishSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Quinn v. MillsapSearch
-
the Equal Protection Clause, Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
Quinn v. MissouriSearch
-
and Chappelle v. GreaterSearch
-
Anderson v. BrandSearch
-
Baker v. CarrSearch
-
ASARCO Inc. v. KadishSearch
-
See Mayor of Philadelphia v. EducationalSearch
-
Martin v. Hunter'sSearch
-
III A In Turner v. FoucheSearch
-
Ball v. JamesSearch
-
Salyer Land Co. v. TulareSearch
-
and Associated Enterprises, Inc. v. ToltecSearch
-
Court. Cf. Revere v. MassachusettsSearch
-
the United States District Court. Quinn v. MissouriSearch
-
See Michigan v. LongSearch
-
Shively v. LankfordSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial