Citation network
Texas Vs. Johnson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 21, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 397 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Texas v. JohnsonSearch
-
U.S. 397 (1989) Texas v. JohnsonSearch
-
to the suppression of expression and would therefore permit application of the test set forth in United States v. O'BrienSearch
-
flag's symbolic value, the Texas court nevertheless concluded that our decision in West Virginia Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
prohibited breaches of the peace. Citing Boos v. BarrySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
expressive conduct, permitting him to invoke the First Amendment in challenging his conviction. See, e.g., Spence v. WashingtonSearch
-
next decide whether the State's regulation is related to the suppression of free expression. See, e.g., United States v. O'BrienSearch
-
If the State's regulation is not related to expression, then the less stringent standard we announced in United States v. O'BrienSearch
-
expressive nature of students' wearing of black armbands to protest American military involvement in Vietnam, Tinker v. DesSearch
-
area to protest segregation, Brown v. LouisianaSearch
-
wearing of American military uniforms in a dramatic presentation criticizing American involvement in Vietnam, Schacht v. UnitedSearch
-
and of picketing about a wide variety of causes, see, e.g., Food Employees v. LoganSearch
-
and displaying a red flag, Stromberg v. CaliforniaSearch
-
U. S. 368 -369 (1931), we have held, all may find shelter under the First Amendment. See also Smith v. GoguenSearch
-
Clark v. CommunitySearch
-
Dallas v. StanglinSearch
-
Creative Non-Violence v. WattSearch
-
App.D.C. 19, 55-56, 703 F.2d 586, 622-623 (1983) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (emphasis in original), rev'd sub nom. Clark v. CommunitySearch
-
U. S. 1 , 337 U. S. 4 (1949). See also Cox v. LouisianaSearch
-
Tinker v. DesSearch
-
Coates v. CincinnatiSearch
-
FCC v. PacificaSearch
-
Chaplinsky v. NewSearch
-
which tends to confirm that Texas need not punish this flag desecration in order to keep the peace. See Boos v. BarrySearch
-
with the policies of this country, expression situated at the core of our First Amendment values. See, e.g., Boos v. BarrySearch
-
Our decision in Boos v. BarrySearch
-
reserved for the flag in our Nation. Brief for Petitioner 22, quoting Smith v. GoguenSearch
-
of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable. See, e.g., Hustler Magazine v. FalwellSearch
-
City Council of Los Angeles v. TaxpayersSearch
-
Bolger v. YoungsSearch
-
Young v. AmericanSearch
-
Grayned v. RockfordSearch
-
Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySearch
-
Brown v. LouisianaSearch
-
We have not recognized an exception to this principle even where our flag has been involved. In Street v. NewSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Texas v. JohnsonSearch
-
West Virginia Board of Education v. BarnetteSearch
-
Citing Boos v. BarrySearch
-
Spence v. WashingtonSearch
-
Vietnam, Tinker v. DesSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial