Citation network
Flight Attendants Vs. Zipes
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Distinguished
-
U.S. 754 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Flight Attendants v. ZipesSearch
-
U.S. 754 (1989) Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. ZipesSearch
-
as the representative of respondents' class. Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Assn., Local 550, TWU, AFL-CIO v. AmericanSearch
-
we deferred consideration of the petitions pending the outcome of ongoing settlement negotiations. Sub nom. Zipes v. TransSearch
-
the settlement in all respects. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Assn., Local 550 v. TransSearch
-
and consolidated it with the earlier petition filed by respondents, consideration of which had been deferred. In Zipes v. TransSearch
-
Twu, Afl-Cio V. TransSearch
-
it had earlier awarded against TWA from the settlement fund. A divided panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed. Zipes v. TransSearch
-
We granted the union's petition for certiorari, 488 U.S. 1029 (1989). II In Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. WildernessSearch
-
of the relevant Act, Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
U. S. 412 , 434 U. S. 418 (1978). Thus, in Newman v. PiggieSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Northcross v. MemphisSearch
-
without prospect of fee compensation. It is not clear to us that that consequence will follow. Our decision in Martin v. WilksSearch
-
for violation of federal law and liability for attorney's fees under federal fee-shifting statutes. In Kentucky v. GrahamSearch
-
Cf. Supreme Court of Virginia v. ConsumersSearch
-
related area of constraints upon district courts' discretion to fashion Title VII remedies. See, e.g., Ford Motor Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
foster piecemeal litigation of complex civil rights controversies -- a result that is strongly disfavored. See Martin v. WilksSearch
-
litigation, but rather of protecting legal rights -- ranging from contract-based rights, see, e.g., Richardson v. AlaskaSearch
-
Airlines, Inc., 750 F.2d 763 (CA9 1984) (collective bargaining agreement), to statutory rights, see, e.g., Prate v. FreedmanSearch
-
F.2d 42 (CA2 1978) (Title VII), to constitutional rights, see, e.g., Reeves v. HarrellSearch
-
Grano v. BarrySearch
-
the most important ingredients in flight attendants' collective bargaining agreements. See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. FlightSearch
-
Franks v. BowmanSearch
-
b), which we interpreted in Newman v. PiggieSearch
-
which we interpreted in Hensley v. EckerhartSearch
-
that they are to be interpreted alike. Northcross v. MemphisSearch
-
Bd. of Education, 412 U. S. 427 , 412 U. S. 428 (1973). See also Hanrahan v. HamptonSearch
-
The dissent, post at 491 U. S. 772 , n. 1, distorts our holding in United States v. MonsantoSearch
-
so long as that is the Title VII plaintiff and not the defendant, see Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
that Congress has established and competing interests that it normally takes into account. See, e.g., Ford Motor Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
antidiscrimination policies of Title VII. Ante at 491 U. S. 763 , quoting Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
parties, whose concerns can be addressed most fairly and efficiently in the original Title VII proceeding. Cf. Martin v. WilksSearch
-
against the intervenor's claims in the District Court, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and this Court. See Zipes v. TransSearch
-
fees, it must be guided first and foremost by the interests of the prevailing party. See Texas State Teachers Assn. v. GarlandSearch
-
Charles v. DaleySearch
-
attorney's fees. Page 491 U. S. 772 The majority overlooks both of these textual directives. After Zipes v. TransSearch
-
in awarding attorney's fees in civil rights cases should respect the objectives of Title VII. See Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
Christiansburg Garment, supra, at 434 U. S. 418 , quoting Newman v. PiggieSearch
-
to obtain relief, often long after the named defendant has conceded that it violated the Act. See, e.g., Geier v. RichardsonSearch
-
Reproductive Health v. AkronSearch
-
Vulcan Society of Westchester Co., Inc. v. FireSearch
-
promise that prevailing plaintiffs will be made whole for efforts to vindicate their civil rights. Cf. Sullivan v. HudsonSearch
-
does not Page 491 U. S. 776 require a finding that any party caused a civil rights injury. See Maher v. GagneSearch
-
Page 491 U. S. 777 Kentucky v. GrahamSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial