Citation network
County of Allegheny Vs. Aclu
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jul 03, 1989
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 573 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court County of Allegheny v. ACLUSearch
-
U.S. 573 (1989) County of Allegheny v. AmericanSearch
-
made applicable to state governments by the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court denied relief, relying on Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
in a private park did not violate the Establishment Clause. The Court of Appeals reversed, distinguishing Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
present case must be understood as an impermissible governmental endorsement of Christianity and Judaism under Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
Under Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
but, to the contrary, have required strict scrutiny of practices suggesting a denominational preference. E.g., Larson v. ValenteSearch
-
BLACKMUN, joined by JUSTICE STEVENS, concluded in Part III-B that the concurring and dissenting opinions in Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
are permissible under the Establishment Clause. Pp. 492 U. S. 655 -667. (a) The test set forth in Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
existed unchallenged throughout our history or that have been found permissible in our case law. For example, Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
U. S. 668 , upheld a city's holiday display of a creche, and Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
Cf. Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
Clause of the First Amendment, made applicable to state governments by the Fourteenth Amendment. See Wallace v. JaffreeSearch
-
On May 8, 1987, the District Court denied respondents' request for a permanent injunction. Relying on Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
appealed, and a divided panel of the Court of Appeals reversed. 842 F.2d 655 (CA3 1988). Distinguishing Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
religion was a sufficient basis for holding each display to be in violation of the Establishment Clause under Lemon v. KurzmanSearch
-
Wallace v. JaffeeSearch
-
this Court has attempted to encapsulate the essential precepts of the Establishment Clause. Thus, in Everson v. BoardSearch
-
Id. at 330 U. S. 15 -16. Page 492 U. S. 592 In Lemon v. KurtzmanSearch
-
religion, a concern that has long had a place in our Establishment Clause jurisprudence. See Engel v. VitaleSearch
-
U. S. 421 , 370 U. S. 436 (1962). Thus, in Wallace v. JaffreeSearch
-
in its purpose. Edwards v. AguillardSearch
-
U. S. 593 (1987). And the educational Page 492 U. S. 593 program in School Dist. of Grand Rapids v. BallSearch
-
effect. See also Texas Monthly, Inc. v. BullockSearch
-
U.S. at 472 U. S. 70 (O'CONNOR, J., concurring in judgment) (emphasis added). Accord, Texas Monthly, Inc. v. BullockSearch
-
Abington School District v. SchemppSearch
-
U. S. 97 , 393 U. S. 104 (1968). See also Wallace v. JaffreeSearch
-
to apply Establishment Clause principles to the government's display of objects with religious significance. In Stone v. GrahamSearch
-
on the walls of public classrooms violates the Establishment Clause. Closer to the facts of this litigation is Lynch v. DonnellySearch
-
s support and promotion of religious communications by religious organizations. See, e.g., Texas Monthly, Inc. v. BullockSearch
-
of the Establishment Clause. The display of the creche in this context, therefore, must be permanently enjoined. v. JUSTICESearch
-
with the Establishment Clause. He argues that this conclusion necessarily follows from the Court's decision in Marsh v. ChambersSearch
-
and we have held it to mean no official preference even for religion over nonreligion, see, e.g., Texas Monthly, Inc. v. BullockSearch
-
Skinner v. RailwaySearch
-
ibid., quoting United States v. MontoyaSearch
-
Treasury Employees v. VonSearch
-
against any violation of the Establishment Clause. Bowen v. KendrickSearch
-
it is the purpose of the Establishment Clause to protect. See Larson v. ValenteSearch
-
in Advent or for a Christian club at a public university to sing carols during their Christmas meeting. Cf. Widmar v. VincentSearch
-
chosen to use the religious symbol that the government means to promote religious faith. See Abington School District v. SchemppSearch
-
way he wishes, religiously or otherwise. While no sign can disclaim an overwhelming message of endorsement, see Stone v. GrahamSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court County of Allegheny v. ACLUSearch
-
County of Allegheny v. AmericanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial