Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Hallstrom Vs. Tillamook County

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Nov 07, 1989

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

47 entries 2 linked 45 unlinked
Show
  1. Mohasco Corp. Vs. Silver US Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1980
  2. BaldwIn County Welcome Center Vs. Brown US Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1984
    Relied / Followed
  3. Hallstrom v. Tillamook
    Search
  4. County - 493 U.S. 20 (1989) U.S. Supreme Court Hallstrom v. Tillamook
    Search
  5. County, 493 U.S. 20 (1989) Hallstrom v. Tillamook
    Search
  6. compliance with the statute, since this suit, like RCRA citizen suits generally, was filed by a trained lawyer. Zipes v. Trans
    Search
  7. of a clear statutory command. 844 F.2d 598, 600 (1987), quoting Garcia v. Cecos
    Search
  8. Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE
    Search
  9. Court should deem the notice requirement to be satisfied. See Pymatuning Water Shed Citizens for Hygienic Environment v. Eaton
    Search
  10. an exception where Congress has declined to do so. Petitioners further argue that under our decision in Zipes v. Trans
    Search
  11. U. S. 393 -394. The running of such statutes is traditionally subject to equitable tolling. See, e.g., Honda v. Clark
    Search
  12. to preserve their claims. Page 493 U. S. 28 Johnson v. Railway
    Search
  13. Zipes v. Trans
    Search
  14. World Airlines, Inc., supra, at 455 U. S. 397 , quoting Love v. Pullman
    Search
  15. the words of the statute are conclusive. Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTE
    Search
  16. United States v. Ron
    Search
  17. Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 U. S. 235 , 489 U. S. 242 (1989), quoting Griffin v. Oceanic
    Search
  18. for enforcing environmental regulations, thus obviating the need for citizen suits. See Gwaltney of Smithfield, Inc. v. Chesapeake
    Search
  19. United States v. American
    Search
  20. actually accomplish the objective that the citizen was attempting to stop. See, e.g., Save Our Sound Fisheries Assn. v. Callaway
    Search
  21. Garcia v. Cecos
    Search
  22. b) is jurisdictional in the strict sense of the term. See Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNary
    Search
  23. rule, if an action is barred by the terms of a statute, it must be dismissed. Thus, in Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown
    Search
  24. of a right-to-sue letter had tolled the 90-day period. 466 U.S. at 466 U. S. 149 . But cf. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans
    Search
  25. the factors which have led us to apply decisions nonretroactively are not present in this case. See Chevron Oil Co. v. Hillson
    Search
  26. Circuit in this case, have construed the notice provision as a mandatory prerequisite for suit. See, e.g., Garcia v. Cecos
    Search
  27. Highland Park v. Train
    Search
  28. parties had notice in fact of the alleged violations more than 60 days before the suit was filed, see, e.g., Proffitt v. Bristol
    Search
  29. if the District Court stayed the proceedings for 60 days, see Pymatuning Water Shed Citizens for Hygienic Environment v. Eaton
    Search
  30. bringing suit does not necessarily mandate dismissal of her action is apparent from our decision in Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans
    Search
  31. Love v. Pullman
    Search
  32. extrinsic to statutory language enter into the decision as to what sanction is appropriate. See also United States v. Robinson
    Search
  33. Ante at 493 U. S. 29 (quoting Gwaltney of Smithfield, Inc. v. Chesapeake
    Search
  34. ante at 493 U. S. 31 , a citation to Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown
    Search
  35. U.S. Supreme Court Hallstrom v. Tillamook
    Search
  36. Hygienic Environment v. Eaton
    Search
  37. Honda v. Clark
    Search
  38. Johnson v. Railway
    Search
  39. Griffin v. Oceanic
    Search
  40. See Gwaltney of Smithfield, Inc. v. Chesapeake
    Search
  41. Save Our Sound Fisheries Assn. v. Callaway
    Search
  42. Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNary
    Search
  43. Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans
    Search
  44. See Chevron Oil Co. v. Hillson
    Search
  45. Proffitt v. Bristol
    Search
  46. United States v. Robinson
    Search
  47. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Inc. v. Chesapeake
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial