Citation network
Lowenfield Vs. Phelps
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 13, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 231 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Lowenfield v. PhelpsSearch
-
U.S. 231 (1988) Lowenfield v. PhelpsSearch
-
capital sentencing juries express the conscience of the community on the ultimate question of life or death. Jenkins v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 380 U. S. 445 , and United States v. UnitedSearch
-
the supplemental instruction given in this case did not require the jury to reach a decision. Similarly, Brasfield v. UnitedSearch
-
Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
offenses so that the jury finding at the guilt phase responds to this concern, as Louisiana has done here. See Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
Art. 905.4(h). On direct appeal, the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the convictions and sentences. State v. LowenfieldSearch
-
Jenkins v. UnitedSearch
-
per curiam). The use of a supplemental charge has long been sanctioned. Nearly a century ago, in Allen v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 586 , 604 (1978). Petitioner relies on this Court's decision in Jenkins v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
petitioner's reliance. The same is true of the colloquy between the judge and the foreman of the jury in United States v. UnitedSearch
-
effect of the supplemental charge was exacerbated by inquiries made to the jury by the trial court. In Brasfield v. UnitedSearch
-
the polls or the supplemental instruction. We do not suggest that petitioner thereby waived this issue, Wainwright v. WittSearch
-
under Louisiana law. See State v. WilliamsSearch
-
Profitt v. FloridaSearch
-
In Zant v. StephensSearch
-
performed by jury findings at either the sentencing phase of the trial or the guilt phase. Our opinion in Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
All of the Federal Courts of Appeals have upheld some form of a supplemental jury charge. See United States v. AngiuloSearch
-
United States v. FioravantiSearch
-
F.2d 407, 414-420 (CA3), cert. denied sUb nom. Panaccione v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SawyersSearch
-
United States v. ScottSearch
-
United States v. SilvernSearch
-
Potter v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BonamSearch
-
United States v. McKinneySearch
-
United States v. ReySearch
-
United States v. ThomasSearch
-
We note that our ruling in Jenkins v. UnitedSearch
-
States was based on our supervisory power over the federal courts, cf. United States v. HaleSearch
-
s per se reversal approach must be followed when reviewing state proceedings on habeas corpus. E.g., Williams v. ParkeSearch
-
Locks v. SumnerSearch
-
cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Page 484 U. S. 247 Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
surrounding the jury's progress from deadlock to unanimity. Jenkins v. UnitedSearch
-
demands a greater degree of reliability in capital sentencings than in other criminal proceedings. See, e.g., Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
Woodson v. NorthSearch
-
as irrelevant all events preceding the polling of the jury and the administration of the Allen charge. Allen v. UnitedSearch
-
counsel's specific request that the jury be instructed that it was not required by law to return a verdict. In Hyde v. UnitedSearch
-
Ante at 484 U. S. 240 (quoting Brasfield v. UnitedSearch
-
it blandly notes that this case is factually distinguishable from our other significant jury coercion cases, Jenkins v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 380 U. S. 445 (1965), and United States v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Lowenfield v. PhelpsSearch
-
and United States v. UnitedSearch
-
Similarly, Brasfield v. UnitedSearch
-
Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial