Citation network
United States Vs. Owens
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 554 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. OwensSearch
-
U.S. 554 (1988) United States v. OwensSearch
-
fair opportunity to bring out the witness' bad memory and other facts tending to discredit his testimony. Cf. Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
hearsay declarant's memory loss both with respect to the Confrontation Clause, see, e.g., United States ex rel. Thomas v. CuylerSearch
-
F.2d 460, 462-463 (CA3 1977), and with respect to Rule 802, see, e.g., United States v. LewisSearch
-
This has long been read as securing an adequate opportunity to cross-examine adverse witnesses. See, e.g., Mattox v. UnitedSearch
-
founded upon a witness' loss of memory, but in two cases has expressly left that possibility open. In California v. GreenSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Id. at 399 U. S. 188 . In Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
Delaware v. VanSearch
-
testimony, and the special importance of cross-examination when such hearsay is proffered. See, e.g., Manson v. BrathwaiteSearch
-
standard applicable to the Confrontation Clause violation, see Delaware v. VanSearch
-
d)(1)(A), by simply asserting lack of memory of the facts to which the prior testimony related. See United States v. MurphySearch
-
declarant testified under oath, subject to cross-examination, and the jury was able to observe his demeanor. People v. GreenSearch
-
California v. GreenSearch
-
Nelson v. O'NeilSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting California v. GreenSearch
-
supra, at 399 U. S. 161 ). See also Ohio v. RobertsSearch
-
these substantive constitutional requirements today, the Court relies almost exclusively on our decision in Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
In Ohio v. RobertsSearch
-
since confirmed that the Sixth Amendment guarantees an opportunity for meaningful cross-examination. See Kentucky v. StincerSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. OwensSearch
-
Cf. Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
Thomas v. CuylerSearch
-
United States v. LewisSearch
-
Mattox v. UnitedSearch
-
In California v. GreenSearch
-
In Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
See United States v. MurphySearch
-
People v. GreenSearch
-
Nelson v. O'NeilSearch
-
See Kentucky v. StincerSearch
-
Kentucky v. StincerSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial