Citation network
Department of the Navy Vs. Egan
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 518 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Department of the Navy v. EganSearch
-
U.S. 518 (1988) Department of the Navy v. EganSearch
-
in the Navy's arsenal, and as playing a crucial part in our Nation's defense system. See Concerned About Trident v. SchlesingerSearch
-
Id. at 515. The Board found no binding legal precedent. It acknowledged the presence of the decision in Hoska v. DepartmentSearch
-
M.S.P.R. at 516. Thus, earlier Board cases that had relied upon Hoska, see, e.g., Bogdanowicz v. DepartmentSearch
-
citing Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSearch
-
of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant. See Cafeteria Workers v. McElroySearch
-
in withholding national security information from unauthorized persons in the course of executive business. Snepp v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 444 U. S. 507 , 444 U. S. 509 , n. 3 (1980). See also United States v. RobelSearch
-
Totten v. UnitedSearch
-
Molerio v. FBISearch
-
Adams v. LairdSearch
-
reluctant to intrude upon the authority of the Executive in military and national security affairs. See, e.g., Orloff v. WilloughbySearch
-
Block v. CommunitySearch
-
Nothing in the Act, however, directs or empowers the Board to go further. Cf. Zimmerman Page 484 U. S. 531 v. DepartmentSearch
-
Buriani v. DepartmentSearch
-
Bacon v. DepartmentSearch
-
Doe v. WeinbergerSearch
-
U.S.App.D.C. 96, 101, 820 F.2d 1275, 1280 (1987), cert. pending sub nom. Carlucci v. DoeSearch
-
to national security concerns. It is difficult to reconcile today's decision with the Court's discussion in Greene v. McElroySearch
-
that individuals are not wrongfully deprived of their livelihoods or other significant interests. See, e.g., Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
cases involving denials of security clearances without any documented harm to national security. See, e.g., Hoska v. UnitedSearch
-
Gayer v. SchlesingerSearch
-
McKeand v. LairdSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Department of the Navy v. EganSearch
-
See Concerned About Trident v. SchlesingerSearch
-
Hoska v. DepartmentSearch
-
Bogdanowicz v. DepartmentSearch
-
See Cafeteria Workers v. McElroySearch
-
Snepp v. UnitedSearch
-
Doe v. WeinbergerSearch
-
Hoska v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. ReynoldsSearch
-
United States v. NixonSearch
-
Burns v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial