Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

ins Vs. Abudu

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 01, 1988

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

58 entries 7 linked 51 unlinked
Show
  1. ins Vs. Bagamasbad US Supreme Court · Nov 01, 1976
  2. ins Vs. Phinpathya US Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1984
  3. ins Vs. Cardoza-fonseca US Supreme Court · Mar 09, 1987
  4. United States Vs. Diebold US Supreme Court · May 14, 1962
  5. ins Vs. Rios-pineda US Supreme Court · May 13, 1985
  6. ins Vs. Stevic US Supreme Court · Jun 05, 1984
  7. United States Vs. Tucker US Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1972
  8. U.S. 94 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court INS v. Abudu
    Search
  9. U.S. 94 (1988) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu
    Search
  10. until it is contradicted or overruled by other evidence.' Maroufi. v. INS
    Search
  11. the nonmoving party under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and the alien seeking reopening under 8 CFR 3.2. See, e.g., United States v. Diebold
    Search
  12. We have consistently held that denials on this third ground are subject to an abuse-of-discretion standard. INS v. Rios-Pineda
    Search
  13. INS v. Jong
    Search
  14. U. S. 139 , 450 U. S. 144 , n. 5 (1981). This footnote, and our subsequent citations of it, INS v. Rios-Pineda
    Search
  15. Ha Wang, 450 U.S. at 450 U. S. 144 , n. 5 (quoting from Judge Wallace's dissenting opinion in Villena v. INS
    Search
  16. evidence, as to which courts have uniformly held that the moving party bears a heavy burden. See, e.g., Taylor v. Illinois
    Search
  17. See INS v. Stevic
    Search
  18. See INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca
    Search
  19. Thus, this case comes to us in a different posture than did INS v. Stevic
    Search
  20. relief (that his freedom would be threatened upon return to Yugoslavia on account of his political opinion). INS v. Stevic
    Search
  21. various approaches taken by Courts of Appeals, adopts general standard set forth by Fifth Circuit in Guevara Flores v. INS
    Search
  22. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best
    Search
  23. Cities of Campbell v. FERC
    Search
  24. Duval Corp. v. Donovan
    Search
  25. Nance v. EPA
    Search
  26. Crow Tribe of Indians, Montana v. EPA
    Search
  27. United States v. Tucker
    Search
  28. United States v. Vergara
    Search
  29. Aviles-Torres v. INS
    Search
  30. Bahranmia v. INS
    Search
  31. Ananeh-Firempong v. INS
    Search
  32. Duran v. INS
    Search
  33. Samimi v. INS
    Search
  34. Torres-Hernandez v. INS
    Search
  35. Sakhavat v. INS
    Search
  36. Conti v. INS
    Search
  37. Riasati v. INS
    Search
  38. Motamedi v. INS
    Search
  39. LeBlanc v. INS
    Search
  40. F.2d 685, 689 (CA1 1983) (suggesting that our holding in INS v. Jong
    Search
  41. Chae Kim Ro v. INS
    Search
  42. Au Yi Lau v. INS
    Search
  43. Brown v. INS
    Search
  44. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon
    Search
  45. Hampton v. Mow
    Search
  46. U.S. Supreme Court INS v. Abudu
    Search
  47. Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Abudu
    Search
  48. Maroufi. v. INS
    Search
  49. Villena v. INS
    Search
  50. Taylor v. Illinois
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial