Citation network
Lyng Vs. Automobile Workers
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 23, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Lyng v. AutomobileSearch
-
Workers - 485 U.S. 360 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Lyng v. AutomobileSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Workers, 485 U.S. 360 (1988) Lyng v. InternationalSearch
-
will have any effect at all. Cf. Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
additional food stamp assistance to strikers simply because the strike has caused a decline in their income. Abood v. DetroitSearch
-
requiring this Court to examine appellees' equal protection claims under a heightened standard of review. Zablocki v. RedhailSearch
-
based on the associational rights asserted by appellees is foreclosed by the reasoning this Court adopted in Lyng v. CastilloSearch
-
NAACP v. ClaiborneSearch
-
combination of individual workers together in order better to assert their lawful rights. See, e.g., Railroad Trainmen v. VirginiaSearch
-
has no unconstitutional impact on the right of individuals to associate for various purposes. Lincoln Union v. NorthwesternSearch
-
Similarly, in Board of Directors of Rotary Int'l v. RotarySearch
-
Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
to minimize that result by qualifying the striker for food stamps. In Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySearch
-
appellees' right to express themselves about union matters free of coercion by the Government. Appellees rely on Abood v. DetroitSearch
-
Regan, supra, at 461 U. S. 550 , quoting Harris v. McRaeSearch
-
Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSearch
-
Dandridge v. WilliamsSearch
-
about how best to spend money to improve the general welfare is lodged in Congress, rather than the courts. Bowen v. OwensSearch
-
Bates v. LittleSearch
-
even by government actions that do not directly restrict individuals' ability to associate freely. See, e.g., Healy v. JamesSearch
-
Board of Directors of Rotary Int'l v. RotarySearch
-
lacks the specific intent to further any illegal aims that may be promoted by other members of a group. NAACP v. ClaiborneSearch
-
Appellees rely heavily on Sherbert v. VernerSearch
-
that strikers as a class are entitled to special treatment under the Equal Protection Clause. City of Charlotte v. FirefightersSearch
-
Hodory, 431 U.S. at 431 U. S. 489 . Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
Ante at 485 U. S. 370 , quoting Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSearch
-
Castro, 429 U. S. 181 , 429 U. S. 185 (1976), quoting Mathews v. LucasSearch
-
Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
Plyler v. DoeSearch
-
rational basis test. In some cases, the Court found that the legislature's goal was not legitimate. See, e.g., Hooper v. BernalilloSearch
-
the classification employed by the legislature did not rationally further the legislature's goal. See, e.g., Lindsey v. NormetSearch
-
classification and the purported legislative goal suggests that the true goal is illegitimate. See, e.g., Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
-
ante at 485 U. S. 373 , quoting Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySearch
-
that such classifications themselves be rational, rather than Page 485 U. S. 377 arbitrary. See Reed v. ReedSearch
-
in Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySearch
-
in this one-sided and devastating way amounts to a penalty on strikers, not neutrality. D In Cleburne v. CleburneSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial