Citation network
Kungys Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 02, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Kungys v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 485 U.S. 759 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Kungys v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 485 U.S. 759 (1988) Kungys v. UnitedSearch
-
a), as illuminated by Chaunt v. UnitedSearch
-
and 1623. The dicta in Chaunt v. UnitedSearch
-
f)(6). In Fedorenko v. UnitedSearch
-
a), and Chaunt v. UnitedSearch
-
a), as illuminated by language in Chaunt v. UnitedSearch
-
not dispute, that this requires misrepresentations or concealments that are both willful and material. See Fedorenko v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 485 U. S. 768 This Court has had occasion to consider the last two requirements only twice. In Chaunt v. UnitedSearch
-
A year later, in Costello v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
success. Not only have the Courts of Appeals failed to arrive at a single interpretation ( compare United States v. RielaSearch
-
F.2d 986 (CA3 1964), and United States v. RossiSearch
-
F.2d 650 (CA9 1962), with Kassab v. INSSearch
-
F.2d 806 (CA6 1966), and Langhammer v. HamiltonSearch
-
concept as embodied in such statutes. See, e.g., Gonzales v. UnitedSearch
-
Weinstock v. UnitedSearch
-
Blackmon v. UnitedSearch
-
Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LardieriSearch
-
United States v. KoonceSearch
-
the decisionmaking body to which it was addressed. See, e.g., Weinstock v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CorsinoSearch
-
NLRB v. AmaxSearch
-
Coal Co., 453 U. S. 322 , 453 U. S. 329 (1981). See also Perrin v. UnitedSearch
-
This test must be met, of course, by evidence that is clear, unequivocal, and convincing. See, e.g., Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
Sinclair v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. AbadiSearch
-
we have described -- bearing in mind the unusually high burden of proof in denaturalization cases. Baumgartner v. UnitedSearch
-
Proof of materiality can sometimes be regarded as establishing a rebuttable presumption. See, e.g., Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSearch
-
rule of statutory interpretation that no provision should be construed to be entirely redundant. See, e.g., Colautti v. FranklinSearch
-
United States v. MenascheSearch
-
Supplemental Brief for United States 3. See, e.g., Sharaiha v. HoySearch
-
I. & N. Dec. 403, 404-405 (1959). See also Ensign v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
we recently described falsity and materiality as separate requirements of misrepresentation, see Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSearch
-
the subjective intent of thereby obtaining immigration or naturalization benefits. See generally Pullman-Standard v. SwintSearch
-
Berenyi v. DistrictSearch
-
a) Should the materiality standard articulated in Chaunt v. UnitedSearch
-
a). See Fedorenko v. UnitedSearch
-
conclude that the Court of Appeals improperly made a finding on a disputed question of fact. See Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSearch
-
was ineligible, for, as we have repeatedly emphasized, citizenship is a most precious right, see, e.g., Klapprott v. UnitedSearch
-
Klapprott v. UnitedSearch
-
time of his application for citizenship. Neither argument is tenable. Over a quarter of a century ago, in Chaunt v. UnitedSearch
-
Page 485 U. S. 790 In his separate opinion in Fedorenko v. UnitedSearch
-
in such cases by clear, unequivocal and convincing evidence which does not leave the issue in doubt. Schneiderman v. UnitedSearch
-
an American citizen or to our previous rejection of default judgments in denaturalization proceedings. See Klapprott v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial