Citation network
Amadeo Vs. Zant
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 31, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 214 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Amadeo v. ZantSearch
-
U.S. 214 (1988) Amadeo v. ZantSearch
-
of black people and women in the master jury lists from which all grand and traverse (petit) juries were drawn. Bailey v. ViningSearch
-
people and women on the master jury lists from which all grand and traverse (petit) juries were drawn. See Bailey v. ViningSearch
-
juries without giving rise to a prima facie case of racial discrimination under this Court's opinion in Swain v. AlabamaSearch
-
is insufficient to prove intentional discrimination), and the Fifth Circuit's opinion in Preston v. MandevilleSearch
-
District Court ordered the Jury Commissioners to reconstitute the lists in conformity with the Constitution. Bailey v. ViningSearch
-
Page 486 U. S. 219 Amadeo v. StateSearch
-
habeas proceeding only if he established cause and prejudice within the meaning of this Court's decision in Francis v. HendersonSearch
-
App. 80. The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing. Amadeo v. KempSearch
-
challenged the composition of the jury. Id. at 92. A divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit reversed. Amadeo v. KempSearch
-
Id. at 1513. We granted certiorari, 484 U.S. 912 (1987), and we now reverse. II In Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
requirement of Francis v. HendersonSearch
-
conclusively the contours of the standard, they offer some helpful guidance on the question of cause. In Reed v. RossSearch
-
to petitioner's lawyers, Reed v. RossSearch
-
decision to forgo the jury challenge. Reed v. RossSearch
-
Anderson v. BessemerSearch
-
Anderson v. BessemerSearch
-
City, 470 U.S. at 470 U. S. 574 , citing United States v. YellowSearch
-
Cab Co., 338 U. S. 338 , 338 U. S. 342 (1949), and Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. IvesSearch
-
to ignore the dictates of Rule 52(a) and engage in impermissible appellate factfinding. See Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSearch
-
from the list of registered voters in Putnam County, which was maintained on a racially segregated basis. See Bailey v. ViningSearch
-
law requires that a known challenge to the composition of the grand jury be raised before indictment, see Sanders v. StateSearch
-
and that a challenge to the composition of the traverse jury be raised before voir dire commences, see Spencer v. KempSearch
-
Amadeo v. KempSearch
-
Having conceded this point in both courts below, respondent will not be heard to dispute it here. See Washington v. YakimaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Amadeo v. ZantSearch
-
Bailey v. ViningSearch
-
See Bailey v. ViningSearch
-
Swain v. AlabamaSearch
-
Preston v. MandevilleSearch
-
the Constitution. Bailey v. ViningSearch
-
Amadeo v. StateSearch
-
Francis v. HendersonSearch
-
II In Wainwright v. SykesSearch
-
of Francis v. HendersonSearch
-
In Reed v. RossSearch
-
United States v. YellowSearch
-
and Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. IvesSearch
-
See Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSearch
-
Sanders v. StateSearch
-
Spencer v. KempSearch
-
See Washington v. YakimaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial