Citation network
Johnson Vs. Mississippi
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 13, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 578 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. MississippiSearch
-
U.S. 578 (1988) Johnson v. MississippiSearch
-
an enhanced sentence under Mississippi's habitual criminal statute justified postconviction relief. Phillips v. StateSearch
-
it has been consistently or regularly applied. The bar raised here has not been so applied in Mississippi. In Phillips v. StateSearch
-
Court recently has applied that reasoning to facts substantially similar to those presented in this case. See Nixon v. StateSearch
-
App. 32. The Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the conviction and sentence, Johnson v. StateSearch
-
People v. JohnsonSearch
-
in any capital case. See Gardner v. FloridaSearch
-
U. S. 349 , 430 U. S. 363 -364 (1977) (quoting Woodson v. NorthSearch
-
Mississippi, as well as in other States, in cases involving sentences imposed on habitual criminals. Thus, in Phillips v. StateSearch
-
state procedural ground is not 'adequate' unless the procedural rule is 'strictly or regularly followed.' Barr v. CitySearch
-
Henry v. MississippiSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
here has been consistently or regularly applied. Rather, the weight of Mississippi law is to the contrary. In Phillips v. StateSearch
-
has applied its reasoning in Phillips to facts substantially similar to those presented in this case. In Nixon v. StateSearch
-
questioned the validity of his New York conviction. See Evans v. StateSearch
-
Three justices dissented. Relying on the logic of Phillips v. StateSearch
-
Relying on the State Supreme Court's citation of Evans v. StateSearch
-
Johnson's sentence. Indeed, the remoteness in time of the prior conviction was a mitigating circumstance. Johnson v. StateSearch
-
In Zant v. StephensSearch
-
penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
undertaking to reweigh the two untainted aggravating circumstances against the mitigating circumstances. Cf. Cabana v. BullockSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. MississippiSearch
-
Phillips v. StateSearch
-
Mississippi. In Phillips v. StateSearch
-
See Nixon v. StateSearch
-
Johnson v. StateSearch
-
See Gardner v. FloridaSearch
-
Woodson v. NorthSearch
-
Barr v. CitySearch
-
In Phillips v. StateSearch
-
In Nixon v. StateSearch
-
See Evans v. StateSearch
-
of Phillips v. StateSearch
-
of Evans v. StateSearch
-
the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. GeorgiaSearch
-
Cf. Cabana v. BullockSearch
-
Zant v. StephensSearch
-
Henry v. MississippiSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial