Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Michigan Vs. Chesternut

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 13, 1988

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

35 entries 4 linked 31 unlinked
Show
  1. Florida Vs. Royer US Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1983
  2. United States Vs. Mendenhall US Supreme Court · May 27, 1980
  3. ins Vs. Delgado US Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1984
  4. United States Vs. Cortez US Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1981
  5. U.S. 567 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. Chesternut
    Search
  6. U.S. 567 (1988) Michigan v. Chesternut
    Search
  7. amounts to a seizure under Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  8. Relying on People v. Terrell
    Search
  9. in each individual case. INS v. Delgado
    Search
  10. U. S. 210 , 466 U. S. 215 (1984), quoting United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  11. only that, in this particular case, the police conduct in question did not amount to a seizure. B In Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  12. Id. at 392 U. S. 19 , n. 16. A decade later, in United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  13. Ibid. The Court has since embraced this test. See INS v. Delgado
    Search
  14. U.S. at 466 U. S. 215 . See also Florida v. Royer
    Search
  15. the particular police conduct at issue, but also with the setting in which the conduct occurs. Compare United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  16. to see identification and ticket of individual who stopped upon police's approach constituted seizure), with INS v. Delgado
    Search
  17. Cf. United States v. Knotts
    Search
  18. could reasonably have believed that he was not free to disregard the police presence and go about his business. INS v. Delgado
    Search
  19. in order to pursue him. United States v. Cortez
    Search
  20. The Michigan Court of Appeals rested its holding on People v. Terrell
    Search
  21. supra, and People v. Shabaz
    Search
  22. Mich.App. at 679, 259 N.W.2d at 188, citing Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  23. courts' interpretation of the Federal Constitution, and not on any adequate and independent state ground. See Michigan v. Long
    Search
  24. of police conduct only to the extent that that intent has been conveyed to the person confronted. United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  25. the car to chase the pedestrian suspect on foot, after which the defendant abandoned the inculpatory evidence. People v. Terrell
    Search
  26. People v. Shabaz
    Search
  27. because he reasonably believes, on the basis of their conduct toward him, that he is not free to go. See, e.g., INS v. Delgado
    Search
  28. U.S. Supreme Court Michigan v. Chesternut
    Search
  29. Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  30. People v. Terrell
    Search
  31. B In Terry v. Ohio
    Search
  32. See INS v. Delgado
    Search
  33. Compare United States v. Mendenhall
    Search
  34. and People v. Shabaz
    Search
  35. See Michigan v. Long
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial