Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Loeffler Vs. Frank

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 13, 1988

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

64 entries 5 linked 59 unlinked
Show
  1. Albemarle Paper Co. Vs. Moody US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1975
  2. Chandler Vs. Roudebush US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1976
  3. Library of Congress Vs. Shaw US Supreme Court · Jul 01, 1986
    Relied / Followed
  4. United States Vs. Sherwood US Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1941
  5. Fha Vs. Burr US Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1940
  6. U.S. 549 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Loeffler v. Frank
    Search
  7. U.S. 549 (1988) Loeffler v. Frank
    Search
  8. interest. The Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of prejudgment interest. Relying in part on Library of Congress v. Shaw
    Search
  9. exceptions to the liberal construction rule operate to overcome this presumption. Franchise Tax Board of California v. USPS
    Search
  10. as a suit against a private employer, who is liable for prejudgment interest in a Title VII suit. Library of Congress v. Shaw
    Search
  11. his reinstatement with backpay. App. to Pet. for Cert. A-26. Relying on a decision of its controlling court, Cross v. USPS
    Search
  12. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial of prejudgment interest. Loeffler v. Carlin
    Search
  13. undertook that en banc reconsideration, and, by a 6-to-5 vote, affirmed the judgment of the District Court. Loeffler v. Tisch
    Search
  14. by this Court's recent decision in Library of Congress v. Shaw
    Search
  15. at 823. Page 486 U. S. 554 Because of a conflict with the views of the Eleventh Circuit expressed in Nagy v. USPS
    Search
  16. decide whether, in a Title VII suit, prejudgment interest may be awarded against the Postal Service. Sub nom. Loeffler v. Tisch
    Search
  17. resolution. Absent a waiver of sovereign immunity, the Federal Government is immune from suit. United States v. Sherwood
    Search
  18. the times of their inception by including in the enabling legislation provisions that they may sue and be sued. In FHA v. Burr
    Search
  19. Footnote omitted.) Accord, Franchise Tax Board of California v. USPS
    Search
  20. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction
    Search
  21. sovereign immunity from awards of interest when such awards are an incident of suit. For example, in Standard Oil Co. v. United
    Search
  22. U. S. 79 . Accordingly, interest was allowed. Ibid. See also National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers v. Parrish
    Search
  23. Cf. Library of Congress v. Shaw
    Search
  24. Franchise Tax Board of California v. USPS
    Search
  25. with the Service's operation. FHA v. Burr
    Search
  26. West Virginia v. United
    Search
  27. b), did not provide a cause of action to federal employees. Brown v. GSA
    Search
  28. cause of action under Title VII and effected a waiver of the Government's immunity from suit. See Library of Congress v. Shaw
    Search
  29. commercial entities generally, as, for example a state garnishment statute, see Franchise Tax Board of California v. USPS
    Search
  30. for concluding that Congress intended his implied exception to be added to those that this Court articulated in FHA v. Burr
    Search
  31. and a Title VII suit brought against a private employer. Cf. Chandler v. Roudebush
    Search
  32. and thereby broadly waived sovereign immunity. Franchise Tax Board of California v. USPS
    Search
  33. U.S. at 467 U. S. 520 , quoting FHA v. Page
    Search
  34. United States v. Louisiana
    Search
  35. U. S. 253 , 446 U. S. 264 -265 (1980), quoting United States v. N.Y
    Search
  36. See Brief for Respondent 9. See also Conway v. Electro
    Search
  37. Green v. USX
    Search
  38. United States v. Gregory
    Search
  39. Parson v. Kaiser
    Search
  40. EEOC v. Wooster
    Search
  41. Taylor v. Philips
    Search
  42. Washington v. Kroger
    Search
  43. Domingo v. New
    Search
  44. Nagy v. USPS
    Search
  45. F.2d 1190 (CA11 1985). Cf. EEOC v. County
    Search
  46. Shaw v. Library
    Search
  47. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
    Search
  48. In FHA v. Burr
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Loeffler v. Frank
    Search
  50. Cross v. USPS
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial