Citation network
Mackey Vs. Lanier Collection Agcy.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 17, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
Collection Agcy. - 486 U.S. 825 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
Collection Agcy., 486 U.S. 825 (1988) Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
plans. The state statute's express reference to ERISA plans brings it within the federal law's preemptive reach. Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
its sphere, including those that are consistent with ERISA's substantive requirements. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
a). See, e.g., Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
a). Cf. Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
garnishment procedure is preempted by ERISA. We reserved decision on the issue in Franchise Tax Board of California v. ConstructionSearch
-
a) is not limited to such state laws. See, e.g., Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
supra, at 481 U. S. 47 -48, and Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
plan in federal court, defers to state law to provide methods for collecting judgments. Cf. also Huron Holding Corp. v. LincolnSearch
-
regulatory scheme like ERISA, such omissions are significant ones. Cf. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. RussellSearch
-
Alessi v. Raybestos-ManhattanSearch
-
Cf. Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. FloridaSearch
-
United Airlines, Inc. v. PageSearch
-
later Congress as to the meaning of a law enacted 10 years earlier does not control the issue. United Airlines, Inc. v. McMannSearch
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
state law attachments of welfare benefit plans) was the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Franchise Tax Board of California v. ConstructionSearch
-
a) that Judge Tang expressed in dissent in that case, 679 F.2d at 1310-1311. See, e.g., Misic v. BuildingSearch
-
Pension Trust Fund v. NevarezSearch
-
ERISA welfare benefit plans. See, e.g., Local Union 212, Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Vacation Trust Fund v. LocalSearch
-
First Nat. Bank of Commerce v. LatikerSearch
-
Electrical Workers Credit Union v. IBEW-NECASearch
-
Morris v. LocalSearch
-
Luxemburg v. HotelSearch
-
Abofreka v. AlstonSearch
-
to garnishment and attachment in our more recent cases, as well. See, e.g., Franchise Tax Board of California v. USPSSearch
-
Antico v. AnticoSearch
-
Easterwood v. LeBlancSearch
-
Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. RussellSearch
-
FEC v. NationalSearch
-
Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. DollarSearch
-
United States v. GenerixSearch
-
Dickerson v. NewSearch
-
Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Assn. v. AbbottSearch
-
Consumer Product Safety Comm'n v. GTESearch
-
Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSearch
-
a) is not limited to state laws specifically designed to affect employee benefit plans. See Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
a) is not limited to state laws that conflict with the substantive provisions of ERISA. See Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
employee benefit plans are not tenuous, remote, or peripheral, and that such laws are accordingly preempted. See Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Ante at 486 U. S. 840 , quoting United States v. PriceSearch
-
for enforcing judgments. See ante at 486 U. S. 834 , n. 9, citing Franchise Tax Board of California v. USPSSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Mackey v. LanierSearch
-
Cf. Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial