Citation network
Florida Vs. Long
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 22, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 223 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Florida v. LongSearch
-
U.S. 223 (1988) Florida v. LongSearch
-
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Syllabus Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power V. ManhartSearch
-
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSearch
-
any sex discrimination for all future benefit payments. We revisit our decisions in Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. ManhartSearch
-
U. S. 702 (1978), and Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSearch
-
id. at 463 U. S. 1109 -1111 (O'CONNOR, J., concurring). See also Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSearch
-
be applied to this type of Title VII pension plan suit. Id. at 435 U. S. 723 . See Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
Albemarle Paper, supra, at 422 U. S. 417 (citing Moragne v. StatesSearch
-
benefits based on a retirement that has already occurred as a sort of continuing violation. Our decision in Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
provide retirees with a contractual right to a fixed level of benefits or rate of return on contributions. See Spirt v. TeachersSearch
-
retirees received under the sex-based tables. App. to Pet. for Cert. A65. See Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. ManhartSearch
-
would be prior to our decision in Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Compare Peters v. WayneSearch
-
not violate Title VII if actuarial value of pension plans for similarly situated males and females is equal), and EEOC v. ColbySearch
-
plans, with unequal benefits, based on sex-based tables), with Spirt v. TeachersSearch
-
as unequal contributions barred under Manhart ), vacated and remanded, 463 U.S. 1223 (1983), and Sobel v. YeshivaSearch
-
effective date of our decision in Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSearch
-
VII violations after this Court's earlier Page 487 U. S. 241 decision in Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. ManhartSearch
-
contrary, I believe such relief is clearly appropriate. See id. at 463 U. S. 1093 . Cf. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSearch
-
in the collection of contributions from employees prior to our decision in Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. ManhartSearch
-
a separate violation. Unlike Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSearch
-
retirees' future benefit payments is akin to the perpetuation of past discrimination that we condemned in Bazemore v. FridaySearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Florida v. LongSearch
-
Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSearch
-
Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. ManhartSearch
-
See Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySearch
-
Moragne v. StatesSearch
-
See Spirt v. TeachersSearch
-
Cert. A65. See Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. ManhartSearch
-
and EEOC v. ColbySearch
-
Spirt v. TeachersSearch
-
and Sobel v. YeshivaSearch
-
Cf. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial