Citation network
Houston Vs. Lack
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 24, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 266 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Houston v. LackSearch
-
U.S. 266 (1988) Houston v. LackSearch
-
at the moment of delivery to prison authorities for forwarding to the district court. Cf. Fallen v. UnitedSearch
-
We last addressed questions concerning the timely filing of notices of appeals by pro se prisoners in Fallen v. UnitedSearch
-
stamped on his notice. Respondent stresses that a petition for habeas corpus is a civil action, see Browder v. DirectorSearch
-
by the clerk of the court. Parissi v. TelechronSearch
-
Deloney v. EstelleSearch
-
Aldabe v. AldabeSearch
-
United States v. SollySearch
-
Haney v. MizellSearch
-
Sanchez v. BoardSearch
-
Allen v. SchnuckleSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
court is the moment of filing. The lower courts have, in fact, also held that receipt by a District Judge, Halfen v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 324 F.2d 52, 54 (CA10 1963), or at the former address for the District Court Clerk, Lundy v. UnionSearch
-
is taken has adopted a rule which deems a document filed on mailing. See generally Placeway Construction Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
and that it would put all the evidence about the date of filing in the hands of one party. See, e.g., United States v. LombardoSearch
-
Respondent suggests that this Court has rejected the mailbox rule, citing Parissi v. TelechronSearch
-
Inc., 349 U. S. 46 (1955), and United States v. LombardoSearch
-
Da'Ville v. WiseSearch
-
under Fallen v. UnitedSearch
-
under Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. CherrySearch
-
Meat Packers, Inc., 371 U. S. 215 , 371 U. S. 217 (1962), and Thompson v. INSSearch
-
Business Electronics Corp. v. SharpSearch
-
reasoning that the Post Office can be deemed the agent of the addressee, Household Fire & Carriage Accident Ins. Co. v. GrantSearch
-
Ante at 487 U. S. 274 . See, e.g., Parissi v. TelechronSearch
-
Haney v. MizellSearch
-
Ward v. AtlanticSearch
-
as required by Fallen v. UnitedSearch
-
of the sort recognized in Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. CherrySearch
-
and Wolfsohn v. HankinSearch
-
Griggs v. ProvidentSearch
-
Browder v. DirectorSearch
-
Dept. of Correction of Illinois, 434 U. S. 257 (1978). As we observed in United States v. LockeSearch
-
must be enforced. 'Any less rigid standard would risk encouraging a lax attitude toward filing dates,' United States v. BoyleSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Houston v. LackSearch
-
Cf. Fallen v. UnitedSearch
-
Fallen v. UnitedSearch
-
Browder v. DirectorSearch
-
Parissi v. TelechronSearch
-
Deloney v. EstelleSearch
-
District Judge, Halfen v. UnitedSearch
-
the District Court Clerk, Lundy v. UnionSearch
-
Placeway Construction Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
and United States v. LombardoSearch
-
Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. CherrySearch
-
and Thompson v. INSSearch
-
Household Fire & Carriage Accident Ins. Co. v. GrantSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial