Citation network
Murray Vs. United States
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 27, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Murray v. UnitedSearch
-
States - 487 U.S. 533 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Murray v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 487 U.S. 533 (1988) Murray v. UnitedSearch
-
but later obtained independently from lawful activities untainted by the initial illegality. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
as to that knowledge. This same analysis applies to the tangible evidence, the bales of marijuana. United States v. SilvestriSearch
-
decision of the cases. Page 487 U. S. 535 JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In Segura v. UnitedSearch
-
the Magistrate about their prior warrantless entry, and that the warrant was tainted by that entry. United States v. CarterSearch
-
affirmed, assuming for purposes of its decision that the first entry into the warehouse was unlawful. United States v. MoscatielloSearch
-
exclusionary rule prohibits introduction into evidence of tangible materials seized during an unlawful search, Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 383 (1914), and of testimony concerning knowledge acquired during an unlawful search, Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
Nardone v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 308 U. S. 338 , 308 U. S. 341 (1939). See Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
doctrine. See Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
This is how we used the term in Segura v. UnitedSearch
-
id. at 468 U. S. 813 -814. See also United States v. WadeSearch
-
Costello v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SilvestriSearch
-
We recently assumed this application of the independent source doctrine (in the Sixth Amendment context) in Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
and society) not in the same position they would have occupied if no violation occurred, but in a worse one. See Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. MoscatielloSearch
-
Together with No. 86-1016, Carter v. UnitedSearch
-
vacated the judgment below, and remanded for reconsideration of the Speedy Trial Act issue in light of Henderson v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 476 U. S. 321 (1986). Carter v. UnitedSearch
-
States and Murray v. UnitedSearch
-
the exclusionary rule is principally designed to deter violations of the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., United States v. LeonSearch
-
Elkins v. UnitedSearch
-
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
violations is too slight to justify the social cost of excluding probative evidence from a criminal trial. See Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
United States v. LeonSearch
-
The decision in Segura v. UnitedSearch
-
The litigation risk facing these law enforcement officers may be contrasted with the risk faced by the officer in Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
While I join JUSTICE MARSHALL's opinion explaining why the majority's extension of the Court's holding in Segura v. UnitedSearch
-
Patterson v. IllinoisSearch
-
Weeks v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Murray v. UnitedSearch
-
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
of the Court. In Segura v. UnitedSearch
-
Silverman v. UnitedSearch
-
See Wong Sun v. UnitedSearch
-
Segura v. UnitedSearch
-
See Nix v. WilliamsSearch
-
Carter v. UnitedSearch
-
of Henderson v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. CarterSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial