Citation network
United States Vs. Kozminski
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 931 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. KozminskiSearch
-
U.S. 931 (1988) United States v. KozminskiSearch
-
coercion. These assessments are confirmed by this Court's decisions construing the Amendment, see, e.g., Clyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 1212-1213 (quoting United States v. ShackneySearch
-
conflicts with the definitions adopted by other Courts of Appeals. Writing for the Second Circuit in United States v. ShackneySearch
-
Id. at 487. See also United States v. HarrisSearch
-
United States v. BibbsSearch
-
United States v. MussrySearch
-
F.2d 1448, 1453 (1984). See also United States v. WarrenSearch
-
this Court must give effect to Congress' expressed intention concerning the scope of conduct prohibited. See Dowling v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
States, 473 U. S. 207 , 473 U. S. 213 , 473 U. S. 214 (1985) (citing United States v. WiltbergerSearch
-
thus incorporates the prohibition of involuntary servitude contained in the Thirteenth Amendment. See United States v. PriceSearch
-
over 20 years ago in United States v. GuestSearch
-
U. S. 745 (1966), and United States v. PriceSearch
-
Guest, supra, at 383 U. S. 754 -755. Cf. Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 328 , 240 U. S. 332 (1916). See also Robertson v. BaldwinSearch
-
Butler v. PerrySearch
-
of involuntary servitude, the victim had no available choice but to work or be subject to legal sanction. In Clyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
the Thirteenth Amendment. Id. at 197 U. S. 215 , 197 U. S. 218 . Similarly, in United States v. ReynoldsSearch
-
to prosecution and criminal punishment for failing to perform labor after receiving an advance payment. Pollock v. WilliamsSearch
-
Taylor v. GeorgiaSearch
-
from compelling their citizens, by threat of criminal sanction, to perform certain civic duties. See Hurtado v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 328 (1916) (roadwork). Moreover, in Robertson v. BaldwinSearch
-
s enactment. See United States v. ShackneySearch
-
had involved compulsion of services through the use or threatened use of physical or legal coercion. See, e.g., Clyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
Cong., 1st Sess., 13-14 (1947) (statement of advisory committee member Justin Miller). But see United States v. ShackneySearch
-
Screws v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. SchackneySearch
-
Act -- the rule of reason -- was evinced by the language and the legislative history of the Act. Standard Oil Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
that uncertainty concerning the ambit of criminal statutes should be resolved in favor of lenity. See, e.g., McNally v. UnitedSearch
-
Dowling v. UnitedSearch
-
Liparota v. UnitedSearch
-
Rewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Clyatt v. UnitedSearch
-
weakening the victims with drugs, alcohol, or by lack of food, sleep, or proper medical care. See, e.g., United States v. WarrenSearch
-
United States v. IngallsSearch
-
See Page 487 U. S. 958 United States v. AncarolaSearch
-
U. S. 328 , 240 U. S. 332 (1916). See also Bailey v. AlabamaSearch
-
Hodges v. UnitedSearch
-
to confine the victim against his will. Chatwin v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. KozminskiSearch
-
United States v. ShackneySearch
-
United States v. HarrisSearch
-
United States v. WarrenSearch
-
See Dowling v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial