Citation network
Bowen Vs. Massachusetts
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 879 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Bowen v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U.S. 879 (1988) Bowen v. MassachusettsSearch
-
than money in compensation for losses suffered as a result of the disallowance. Cf. Maryland Dept. of Human Resources v. DepartmentSearch
-
in the same way when we accepted jurisdiction and decided the merits in Connecticut Dept. of Income Maintenance v. HecklerSearch
-
At present, 18 different categories of medical assistance are authorized. See Connecticut Dept. of Income Maintenance v. HecklerSearch
-
case, the court has concluded that the State should proceed in the district court. See Illinois Dept. of Public Aid v. SchweikerSearch
-
Massachusetts v. HecklerSearch
-
laws. See Massachusetts v. SecretarySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
was not barred by the fact that the Department of Education had played a role in their provision. Massachusetts v. HecklerSearch
-
relying on the analysis of the first, the court reversed the Board's second disallowance determination. Massachusetts v. HecklerSearch
-
Massachusetts v. DepartmentalSearch
-
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that the decision was reviewable in the District Court. County of Alameda v. WeinbergerSearch
-
Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
School Committee of Burlington v. DepartmentSearch
-
In his opinion for the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Maryland Dept. of Human Resources v. DepartmentSearch
-
equitable actions for monetary relief under a contract in exactly those terms. See, e.g., First National State Bank v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Crouch v. CrouchSearch
-
Joyce v. DavisSearch
-
cannot transform the nature of the relief sought -- specific relief, not relief in the form of damages. Cf. Clark v. LibrarySearch
-
the well-settled presumption that Congress understands the state of existing law when it legislates, see, e.g., Cannon v. UniversitySearch
-
Third, the case that they discussed at Page 487 U. S. 899 the greatest length in the 1970 Hearing was Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
would have understood the recovery of specific monies to be specific relief in this context. See, e.g., Larson v. DomesticSearch
-
Together with No. 87-929, Massachusetts v. BowenSearch
-
jurisdiction over a State's appeal from a federal administrative disallowance in a grant-in-aid program. Massachusetts v. SecretarySearch
-
Maryland Dept. of Human Resources v. DepartmentSearch
-
Noot v. HecklerSearch
-
Illinois Dept. of Public Aid v. SchweikerSearch
-
County of Alameda v. WeinbergerSearch
-
has held the Claims Court to be the proper tribunal to resolve administrative appeals. Chula Vista City School Dist. v. BennettSearch
-
District of Columbia Circuit has recently reaffirmed Maryland Dept. of Human Resources in National Assn. of Counties v. BakerSearch
-
recommendation relating to statutory reform of the sovereign immunity doctrine) (citing Lee County School Dist. No. 1 v. GardnerSearch
-
F.Supp. 26 (SC 1967) and Dermott Special School Dist. v. GardnerSearch
-
as addressing only finality concerns. Massachusetts v. DepartmentalSearch
-
Supp.1988). Cases decided by this Court reviewing decisions of such three-judge panels include Pennsylvania R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 323 U. S. 588 (1945), and Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSearch
-
Massachusetts v. DepartmentalSearch
-
Eastport S.S. Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1009 (1967) (cited with approval in United States v. TestanSearch
-
b), see United States v. TestanSearch
-
ed.) (repealed, see 76 Stat. 498 (1962)), which provided compensation to prisoners of war, see Bell v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. MottazSearch
-
here, of course, is whether Congress intended a cause of action that it did not expressly provide. See, e.g., Thompson v. ThompsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial