Citation network
Morrison Vs. Olson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 29, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 654 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Morrison v. OlsonSearch
-
U.S. 654 (1988) Morrison v. OlsonSearch
-
There is no merit to appellant's contention -- based on Blair v. UnitedSearch
-
and conviction. The Act instead puts the removal power squarely in the hands of the Executive Branch. Bowsher v. SynarSearch
-
and Myers v. UnitedSearch
-
under Article II. Cf. Humphrey's Executor v. UnitedSearch
-
Wiener v. UnitedSearch
-
of Appeals cannot be reviewed on this appeal from the District Court's contempt judgment. Appellant relies on Blair v. UnitedSearch
-
between the parties, and the courts possess the power to redress or resolve the current controversy. See Bender v. WilliamsportSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 508 , 99 U. S. 509 (1879). As we stated in Buckley v. ValeoSearch
-
officer. In United States v. EatonSearch
-
see id. at 100 U. S. 379 -380, were inferior officers for purposes of the Clause. In Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 282 U. S. 353 , n. 2. All of this is consistent with our reference in United States v. NixonSearch
-
recognized that courts may appoint private attorneys to act as prosecutor for judicial contempt judgments. See Young v. UnitedSearch
-
States ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S.A., 481 U. S. 787 (1987). In Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Lower courts have also upheld interim judicial appointments of United States Attorneys, see United States v. SolomonSearch
-
See Muskrat v. UnitedSearch
-
Buckley, 424 U.S. at 424 U. S. 123 (citing United States v. FerreiraSearch
-
to prevent the judiciary from encroaching into areas reserved for the other branches. See United States Parole Comm'n v. GeraghtySearch
-
to construe a statute in order to save it from constitutional infirmities, see, e.g., Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. SchorSearch
-
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. SchorSearch
-
Id. at 478 U. S. 726 . A primary antecedent for this ruling was our 1926 decision in Myers v. UnitedSearch
-
a)(3). In our view, the removal provisions of the Act make this case more analogous to Humphrey's Executor v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 295 U. S. 602 (1935), and Wiener v. UnitedSearch
-
constitutional scheme of the separation of governmental powers into the three coordinate branches. See, e.g., Bowsher v. SynarSearch
-
U. S. 725 (citing Humphrey's Executor, 295 U.S. at 295 U. S. 629 -630). As we stated in Buckley v. ValeoSearch
-
Nixon v. AdministratorSearch
-
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSearch
-
by Congress to increase its own powers at the expense of the Executive Branch. Cf. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. SchorSearch
-
U.S. at 478 U. S. 856 . Unlike some of our previous cases, most recently Bowsher v. SynarSearch
-
INS v. ChadhaSearch
-
functions that we have recognized generally as being incidental to the legislative function of Congress. See McGrain v. DaughertySearch
-
Nixon v. AdministratorSearch
-
in the appointment of court officials such as United States commissioners or magistrates, see Go-Bart Importing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
by, if necessary, compelling the testimony of witnesses. See Brown v. UnitedSearch
-
of criminal investigations on the basis of evidence or affidavits submitted in an ex parte proceeding. In Young v. UnitedSearch
-
This same argument was raised by the Solicitor General in Bowsher v. SynarSearch
-
impediment to congressionally imposed restrictions on the President's removal powers. See also United States v. PerkinsSearch
-
officials is illustrated by a comparison of our decisions in cases such as Humphrey's Executor, Buckley v. ValeoSearch
-
language which we think is more than the text will bear. It is also contrary to our holding in United States v. PerkinsSearch
-
United States v. HouseSearch
-
caution that we owe great deference to Congress' view that what it has done is constitutional, see, e.g., Rostker v. GoldbergSearch
-
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. DemocraticSearch
-
United States v. NationalSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial