Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Pittston Coal Gp. Vs. Sebben

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Dec 06, 1988

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

56 entries 5 linked 51 unlinked
Show
  1. Heckler Vs. Ringer US Supreme Court · May 14, 1984
  2. U.S. Bulk Carriers, Inc. Vs. Arguelles US Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1971
  3. Maine Vs. Thiboutot US Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1980
  4. County Court of Ulster County Vs. Allen US Supreme Court · Jun 04, 1979
  5. Udall Vs. Tallman US Supreme Court · Mar 01, 1965
  6. U.S. 105 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court Pittston Coal Gp. v. Sebben
    Search
  7. U.S. 105 (1988) Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben
    Search
  8. in adjudicating their claims, see 20 CFR pt. 727 (1988), did not comply with this provision. In Broyles v. Director
    Search
  9. of pneumoconiosis, a chronic respiratory and pulmonary disease arising from coal mine employment. See Mullins Coal Co. v. Director
    Search
  10. II One of the three consolidated cases before us, Director, OWCP v. Broyles
    Search
  11. HEW regulations. See 824 F.2d at 329-330. The other two consolidated cases before us, Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben
    Search
  12. No. 87-821, and McLaughlin v. Sebben
    Search
  13. The panel's opinion relied on the Eighth Circuit's earlier decision in Coughlan v. Director
    Search
  14. and that her resolution of that ambiguity is reasonable, and therefore must be sustained. See Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  15. of the claimant to do his former mine work or the equivalent because of pneumoconiosis). See Mullins Coal Co. v. Director
    Search
  16. to avoid the bar of res judicata on the ground that the decision was wrong. We do not believe that Bowen v. City
    Search
  17. Together with No. 87-827, McLaughlin, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. Sebben
    Search
  18. et al., also on certiorari to the same court, and No. 87-1095, Director, Office of Workers ' Compensation Programs v. Broyles
    Search
  19. f)(2). See Kyle v. Director
    Search
  20. Halon v. Director
    Search
  21. OWCP, 713 F.2d 21 (CA3 1983). The Seventh Circuit has held to the contrary. See Strike v. Director
    Search
  22. of thousands of coal miners who have spent their entire working lives inhaling coal dust. See Mullins Coal Co. v. Director
    Search
  23. Secretary's interpretation of the statute Page 488 U. S. 125 she must administer. See, e.g., K mart Corp. v. Cartier
    Search
  24. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  25. by the two Circuit Court judges who conducted a thorough investigation into the background of the BLBRA. See Strike v. Director
    Search
  26. Usery v. Turner
    Search
  27. Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U. S. 1 , 428 U. S. 7 (1976). Page 488 U. S. 150 V Deference
    Search
  28. deferring to its construction, rather than importing our own becomes more appropriate. See, e.g., Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  29. Aluminum Co. of America v. Central
    Search
  30. that does not cleanly reflect Congress' intention. See, e.g., Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores
    Search
  31. Cass v. United
    Search
  32. United States v. Locke
    Search
  33. As we said just last Term in Mullins Coal Co., Inc. v. Director
    Search
  34. reason to defer to the reasonable view of the Executive Branch on the subject. See, e.g., Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. Wichita
    Search
  35. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc. v. State
    Search
  36. It is also relevant that the Secretary was involved in the drafting of the BLBRA. See, e.g., Miller v. Youakim
    Search
  37. Udall v. Tallman
    Search
  38. U.S. Supreme Court Pittston Coal Gp. v. Sebben
    Search
  39. Pittston Coal Group v. Sebben
    Search
  40. In Broyles v. Director
    Search
  41. See Mullins Coal Co. v. Director
    Search
  42. Director, OWCP v. Broyles
    Search
  43. and McLaughlin v. Sebben
    Search
  44. Coughlan v. Director
    Search
  45. See Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural
    Search
  46. Bowen v. City
    Search
  47. Compensation Programs v. Broyles
    Search
  48. See Kyle v. Director
    Search
  49. See Strike v. Director
    Search
  50. Corp. v. Cartier
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial