Citation network
Ncaa Vs. Tarkanian
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Dec 12, 1988
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 179 (1988) U.S. Supreme Court NCAA v. TarkanianSearch
-
U.S. 179 (1988) National Collegiate Athletic Association v. TarkanianSearch
-
NCAA was a necessary party, and therefore reversed and remanded to permit joinder of the NCAA. University of Nevada v. TarkanianSearch
-
that duty to a private entity. Id. at 336, 741 P.2d at 1348. The court next pointed to our opinion in Lugar v. EdmondsonSearch
-
and private conduct, against which the Amendment affords no shield, no matter how unfair that conduct may be. Shelley v. KraemerSearch
-
Jackson v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Burton v. WilmingtonSearch
-
U. S. 167 , 365 U. S. 172 (1961). As we stated in United States v. ClassicSearch
-
This may occur if the State creates the legal framework governing the conduct, e.g., North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-ChemSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
if it delegates its authority to the private actor, e.g., West v. AtkinsSearch
-
or sometimes if it knowingly accepts the benefits derived from unconstitutional behavior, e.g., Burton v. WilmingtonSearch
-
Cf. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. IndianSearch
-
its own behavior, but that would be true even if UNLV had taken no part in the promulgation of those rules. In Bates v. StateSearch
-
physician who had contracted with a state prison to attend to the inmates' medical needs was a state actor. West v. AtkinsSearch
-
acts in a private capacity when he or she represents a private client in a conflict against the State, Polk County v. DodsonSearch
-
and the state-action requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment are equivalent. See Rendell-Baker v. KohnSearch
-
Lugar v. EdmondsonSearch
-
purposes. E.g., Regents of University of Minnesota v. NCAASearch
-
Howard University v. NCAASearch
-
Parish v. NCAASearch
-
Associated Students, Inc. v. NCAASearch
-
F.2d 1251 (CA9 1974) (per curiam). Since our decisions in Lugar v. EdmondsonSearch
-
Rendell-Baker v. KohnSearch
-
supra, and Blum v. YaretskySearch
-
U. S. 991 (1982), all issued on the same day, lower courts have held to the contrary. E.g., McCormack v. NCAASearch
-
Karmanos v. BakerSearch
-
Graham v. NCAASearch
-
Arlosoroff v. NCAASearch
-
F.2d 1019 (CA4 1984). See Spath v. NCAASearch
-
E.g., Jackson v. MetropolitanSearch
-
institutions located within the same State, many of them public institutions created by the same sovereign. See Clark v. ArizonaSearch
-
The Court unanimously concluded that state action existed in deciding that, by the doctrine enunciated in Parker v. BrownSearch
-
In both contexts, for example, courts examine whether the rule in question is a rule of the State. Compare Hoover v. RonwinSearch
-
entity are intertwined also is pertinent. Compare Hoover, 466 U.S. at 466 U. S. 569 -570, with Burton v. WilmingtonSearch
-
in state action. Brief for Respondent 42. He would draw support from Burton v. WilmingtonSearch
-
In Dennis v. SparksSearch
-
NCAA v. BoardSearch
-
by no means is it a traditional, let alone an exclusive, state function. Cf. San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
H. Kress & Co., 398 U. S. 144 (1970), and Dennis v. SparksSearch
-
As the Nevada Page 488 U. S. 201 Supreme Court found in its first opinion in this case, University of Nevada v. TarkanianSearch
-
The Court notes that the United States Courts of Appeals have, since our decisions in Rendell-Baker v. KohnSearch
-
U. S. 830 (1982), Lugar v. EdmondsonSearch
-
Oil Co., 457 U. S. 922 (1982), and Blum v. YaretskySearch
-
held unanimously that the NCAA is not a state actor. Ante at 488 U. S. 182 , n. 5. See McCormack v. NCAASearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial