Citation network
Pennsylvania Vs. Ritchie
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 01, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U.S. 39 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Pennsylvania v. RitchieSearch
-
U.S. 39 (1987) Pennsylvania v. RitchieSearch
-
Market Street R. Co. v. RailroadSearch
-
is true that the principles of finality have not been construed rigidly. As we recognized in Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
a case is in this procedural posture, we have considered it sufficiently final to justify review. See, e.g., New York v. QuarlesSearch
-
California v. StewartSearch
-
U. S. 436 , 384 U. S. 498 , n. 71 (1966) (decided with Miranda v. ArizonaSearch
-
the right physically to face those who testify against him and the right to conduct cross-examination. Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
the declarant. See Ohio v. RobertsSearch
-
U. S. 56 (1980). Cf. United States v. InadiSearch
-
a witness is biased, or that the testimony is exaggerated or Page 480 U. S. 52 unbelievable. United States v. AbelSearch
-
S. 316 (1974). Because this type of evidence can make the difference between conviction and acquittal, see Napue v. IllinoisSearch
-
the Confrontation Clause's purpose of increasing the accuracy of the truth-finding process at trial. See United States v. InadiSearch
-
U. S. 396 . The Pennsylvania Supreme Court accepted this argument, relying in part on our decision in Davis v. AlaskaSearch
-
improper restrictions on the types of questions that defense counsel may ask during cross-examination. See California v. GreenSearch
-
one's accusers is satisfied if defense counsel receives wide latitude at trial to question witnesses. Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
Id. at 474 U. S. 20 (emphasis in original). See also Ohio v. RobertsSearch
-
We reaffirmed this interpretation of the Confrontation Clause last Term in Delaware v. FenstererSearch
-
The lower court's reliance on Davis v. AlaskaSearch
-
the identity of witnesses, or to require the government to produce exculpatory evidence. But cf. United States v. NixonSearch
-
by Ritchie under the broader protections of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. See United States v. BagleySearch
-
U. S. 83 (1963). See also Wardius v. OregonSearch
-
evidence in its possession that is both favorable to the accused and material to guilt or punishment. United States v. AgursSearch
-
evidence does not include the unsupervised authority to search through the Commonwealth's files. See United States v. BagleySearch
-
U. S. 111 . Although the eye of an advocate may be helpful to a defendant in ferreting out information, Dennis v. UnitedSearch
-
the contrary. In the typical case where a defendant makes only a general request for exculpatory material under Brady v. MarylandSearch
-
counsel has no constitutional right to conduct his own search of the State's files to argue relevance. See Weatherford v. BurseySearch
-
Both Clauses are made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment. Pointer v. TexasSearch
-
Washington v. TexasSearch
-
for the finality doctrine -- efficiency, judicial restraint, and federalism, see Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. JohnsonSearch
-
Nothing in our decision in United States v. RyanSearch
-
of delay, rather than being hindered, would be best served by resolving the issue. Cf. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSearch
-
approach we normally have taken to finality questions. See generally Bradley v. RichmondSearch
-
of cross-examination by prohibiting questions that are prejudicial, irrelevant, or otherwise improper. See Delaware v. VanSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial