Citation network
324 Liquor Corp. Vs. Duffy
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 13, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Liquor Corp. v. DuffySearch
-
U.S. 335 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court 324 Liquor Corp. v. DuffySearch
-
U.S. 335 (1987) 324 Liquor Corp. v. DuffySearch
-
bb was not immune under the state action exemption from the antitrust laws set forth in Parker v. BrownSearch
-
prevents wholesalers from allowing or requiring retail price competition. Cf. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
laws. The State's system does meet the first requirement of the two-part test for determining immunity under Parker v. BrownSearch
-
liquor retailers without substituting an adequate system of regulation. Cf. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
A New York Supreme Court denied the petition. 324 Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlinSearch
-
Misc.2d 746, 464 N.Y.S.2d 355 (1983). The Appellate Division reversed. 324 Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlinSearch
-
bb and reinstated the penalties. J.A.J. Liquor Store, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
bb is not immune under the state action doctrine of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
J.A.J. Liquor Store, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
jurisdiction, 475 U.S. 1080 (1986), and we now reverse. II In California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
Monsanto Co. v. Spray-RiteSearch
-
Service Corp., 465 U. S. 752 , 465 U. S. 761 (1984). See Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. JohnSearch
-
U. S. 342 may stimulate interbrand competition even as it reduces intrabrand competition. Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTESearch
-
manufacturer may announce resale prices in advance and refuse to deal with those who fail to comply. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-RiteSearch
-
United States v. ColgateSearch
-
We have noted that industry-wide resale price maintenance also may facilitate cartelization. Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTESearch
-
Id. at 445 U. S. 103 . As we explained in Rice v. NormanSearch
-
B In Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Hallie v. EauSearch
-
Claire, 471 U. S. 34 , 471 U. S. 38 (1985). Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Ibid. Our decisions have established a two-part test for determining immunity under Parker v. BrownSearch
-
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
Aluminum, Inc., supra, at 479 U. S. 105 (quoting Lafayette v. LouisianaSearch
-
Id. at 445 U. S. 106 (quoting Bates v. StateSearch
-
Twenty-first Amendment powers, though broad, are circumscribed by other provisions of the Constitution. See Larkin v. Grendel'sSearch
-
Department of Revenue v. JamesSearch
-
Hostetter v. IdlewildSearch
-
United States v. TopcoSearch
-
of the Moreland Commission that higher prices do not decrease consumption of liquor. J.A.J. Liquor Store, Inc. v. NewSearch
-
Hooven & Allison Co. v. EvattSearch
-
on state law matters, Indiana ex rel. Anderson v. BrandSearch
-
York State Liquor Authority, 64 N.Y.2d 504, 520, 479 N.E.2d 779, 788 (1985). In Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. ZenithSearch
-
requirement, and so be exempt from the antitrust laws under Parker v. BrownSearch
-
U. S. 341 (1943). See Morgan v. DivisionSearch
-
no occasion to consider whether a simple minimum markup statute would be entitled to antitrust immunity under Parker v. BrownSearch
-
Such comprehensive regulation is immune under Parker v. BrownSearch
-
See New Motor Vehicle Bd. of Cal. v. OrrinSearch
-
Cf. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
Liquor Corp. v. McLaughlinSearch
-
of Parker v. BrownSearch
-
II In California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. MidcalSearch
-
See Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. JohnSearch
-
Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTESearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial