Citation network
MartIn Vs. Ohio
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 25, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 228 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Martin v. OhioSearch
-
U.S. 228 (1987) Martin v. OhioSearch
-
placing on her the self-defense burden of proof. In reaching its decision, the State Supreme Court relied on Patterson v. NewSearch
-
to the instruction requiring petitioner to prove self-defense. The latter court, relying upon our opinion in Patterson v. NewSearch
-
extreme emotional disturbance, which, if proved, would have reduced the crime from murder to manslaughter. Patterson v. NewSearch
-
and we held there was no violation of the Fourteenth Amendment as construed in Winship. Referring to Leland v. OregonSearch
-
U. S. 790 (1952), and Rivera v. DelawareSearch
-
state law, for it has been rejected by the Ohio Supreme Court and by the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. White v. ArnSearch
-
State v. MorrisSearch
-
murder under Ohio law is the specific purpose to take life pursuant to prior calculation and design. See White v. ArnSearch
-
sanity of a defendant who pleads not guilty by reason of insanity. We have had the opportunity to depart from Leland v. OregonSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 790 (1952), but have refused to do so. Rivera v. DelawareSearch
-
had to be considered in determining whether the State's burden had been discharged. We do not depart from Patterson v. NewSearch
-
her guilty. The Ohio Supreme Court upheld the conviction, relying in part on this Court's opinion in Patterson v. NewSearch
-
when an affirmative defense does negate an element of the crime, the state may not shift the burden. See White v. ArnSearch
-
s burden-shifting laws to satisfy ourselves that the requirements of Winship have been satisfied. In Mullaney v. WilburSearch
-
U.S. at 432 U. S. 226 -227 (footnotes omitted). Cf. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
or punishment, without requiring that they also bear the burden of disproving these defenses. See Patterson v. NewSearch
-
that self-defense historically is one of the primary justifications for otherwise unlawful conduct. See, e.g., Beard v. UnitedSearch
-
alleged that she was innocent because she acted in self-defense, a complete justification under Ohio law. See State v. NoltonSearch
-
is so limited that it justifies increasing the risk of convicting a person who may not be blameworthy. See Patterson v. NewSearch
-
quoting Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
have avoided the danger if possible, and must not have been at fault in creating the threatening situation. See State v. RobbinsSearch
-
how the jury should evaluate evidence that affected an element of both the crime and the defense. Cf. Francis v. FranklinSearch
-
McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Martin v. OhioSearch
-
Patterson v. NewSearch
-
and Rivera v. DelawareSearch
-
the Sixth Circuit. White v. ArnSearch
-
See White v. ArnSearch
-
In Mullaney v. WilburSearch
-
Cf. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
-
See Patterson v. NewSearch
-
Beard v. UnitedSearch
-
See State v. NoltonSearch
-
See State v. RobbinsSearch
-
Cf. Francis v. FranklinSearch
-
McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial