Citation network
Arizona Vs. Hicks
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 03, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 321 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Arizona v. HicksSearch
-
U.S. 321 (1987) Arizona v. HicksSearch
-
the evidence that had been seized, and the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed. Relying upon a statement in Mincey v. ArizonaSearch
-
U. S. 333 . Page 480 U. S. 323 JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
the serial numbers, however, as an additional search, unrelated to that exigency. Relying upon a statement in Mincey v. ArizonaSearch
-
doctrine of Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
interest in either the serial numbers or the equipment, and therefore did not amount to a seizure. See Maryland v. MaconSearch
-
search, because it would have produced no additional invasion of respondent's privacy interest. See Illinois v. AndreasSearch
-
where action is taken for the purpose justifying the entry, invocation of the doctrine is superfluous. Mincey v. ArizonaSearch
-
Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
doctrine. Dicta in Payton v. NewSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
U. S. 587 (1980), suggested that the standard of probable cause must be met, but our later opinions in Texas v. BrownSearch
-
authority to make warrantless seizures in public places of such objects as weapons and contraband. See Payton v. NewSearch
-
and the risk -- to themselves or to preservation of the evidence -- of going to obtain a warrant. See Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
necessities render it the only practicable means of detecting certain types of crime. See, e.g., United States v. CortezSearch
-
searches is quite different from that protected by its injunction against unreasonable seizures, see Texas v. BrownSearch
-
opinions of this Court supports such a distinction, not even the dictum from Justice Stewart's concurrence in Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
prong of the plain view exception to the Warrant Clause. See Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
The plurality opinion in Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
In Texas v. BrownSearch
-
Id. at 460 U. S. 742 (quoting Carroll v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 267 U. S. 132 , 267 U. S. 162 (1925)). See also Texas v. BrownSearch
-
objects in plain view). As the Court recognizes, ante at 480 U. S. 326 , the statements in Payton v. NewSearch
-
the judgment of the Arizona Court of Appeals, and therefore dissent. Page 480 U. S. 334 In Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
may be evidence of a crime, contraband, or otherwise subject to seizure. As another plurality observed in Texas v. BrownSearch
-
Ibid. (quoting Coolidge v. NewSearch
-
of an item and a mere inspection of the item was first suggested by Justice Stewart. In his concurrence in Stanley v. GeorgiaSearch
-
picking up or moving objects for a better view -- require only a reasonable suspicion. See, e.g., United States v. MarburySearch
-
United States v. HillyardSearch
-
United States v. WrightSearch
-
United States v. OchsSearch
-
have applied a reasonable suspicion standard in factual circumstances almost identical to this case. See, e.g., State v. NollSearch
-
State v. RiedingerSearch
-
People v. DorrisSearch
-
State v. ProctorSearch
-
People v. EddingtonSearch
-
that the item in question is contraband or evidence of a crime. United States v. PlaceSearch
-
U. S. 696 , 462 U. S. 706 Page 480 U. S. 338 (1983). In Delaware v. ProuseSearch
-
New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
U. S. 341 (1986). The governmental interests considered include crime prevention and detection. Terry v. OhioSearch
-
Ante at 480 U. S. 327 . See United States v. PlaceSearch
-
was even more transitory and less intrusive than the seizure of luggage from a suspected drug dealer in United States v. PlaceSearch
-
in Terry v. OhioSearch
-
more helpful and accurate in detecting stolen property than simple police recollection of the evidence. Cf. New York v. ClassSearch
-
of probable cause has been satisfied. Texas v. BrownSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Arizona v. HicksSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial