Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Town of Newton Vs. Rumery

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 09, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

55 entries 5 linked 50 unlinked
Show
  1. Bordenkircher Vs. Hayes US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1978
  2. imbler Vs. Pachtman US Supreme Court · Nov 03, 1975
  3. Monroe Vs. Pape US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1961
  4. Mcmann Vs. Richardson US Supreme Court · May 04, 1970
  5. Harlow Vs. Fitzgerald US Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1982
  6. U.S. 386 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Town of Newton v. Rumery
    Search
  7. U.S. 386 (1987) Town of Newton v. Rumery
    Search
  8. actions. E.g., Pulliam v. Allen
    Search
  9. does not violate the Constitution, even though a guilty plea waives important constitutional rights. See Brady v. United
    Search
  10. Santobello v. New
    Search
  11. that release-dismissal agreements pose a more coercive choice than other situations we have accepted. E.g., Corbitt v. New
    Search
  12. requiring 'the making of difficult judgments' as to which course to follow. Page 480 U. S. 394 McMann v. Richardson
    Search
  13. Crampton v. Ohio
    Search
  14. decided with McGautha v. California
    Search
  15. In recent years, the Court has considered a number of claims that prosecutors have acted improperly. E.g., Wayte v. United
    Search
  16. also must consider other tangible and intangible factors, such as government enforcement priorities. See Wayte v. United
    Search
  17. Id. at 470 U. S. 607 -608. See United States v. Goodwin
    Search
  18. Crampton v. Ohio
    Search
  19. tangible benefits, such as promptly imposed punishment without the expenditure of prosecutorial resources, see Brady v. United
    Search
  20. actions. See Imbler v. Pachtman
    Search
  21. U. S. 368 , 457 U. S. 373 (1982). E.g., Blackledge v. Perry
    Search
  22. Thus, the Court has never accepted such a blanket claim with respect to pretrial decisions. See United States v. Goodwin
    Search
  23. claims in return for sentencing considerations. See Bushnell v. Rossetti
    Search
  24. Jones v. Taber
    Search
  25. little or no public interest in prosecution may be a legitimate objective of a release-dismissal agreement. See Hoines v. Barney's
    Search
  26. plea bargaining depends in large measure upon eliminating extraneous considerations from the process. See Santobello v. New
    Search
  27. Page 480 U. S. 401 Brady v. United
    Search
  28. to represent the sovereign's interest in the even-handed and effective enforcement of its criminal laws. See Berger v. United
    Search
  29. liability arising out of a prosecutor's decision to initiate criminal proceedings. See Imbler v. Pachtman
    Search
  30. is representing potentially conflicting interests. See id. at Ethical Consideration 5-2. As we noted in Imbler v. Pachtman
    Search
  31. Varella-Cid v. Boston
    Search
  32. Dixon v. District
    Search
  33. MacDonald v. Musick
    Search
  34. Boyd v. Adams
    Search
  35. were not present, presumably the author of the Court's opinion would adhere to the views he expressed in Bordenkircher v Hayes
    Search
  36. see supra at 480 U. S. 412 , and because police have been afforded qualified immunity, see Harlow v. Fitzgerald
    Search
  37. e think that the release is void as against public policy. . . . As well stated in Dixon v. District
    Search
  38. U.S. Supreme Court Town of Newton v. Rumery
    Search
  39. E.g., Pulliam v. Allen
    Search
  40. See Brady v. United
    Search
  41. E.g., Corbitt v. New
    Search
  42. E.g., Wayte v. United
    Search
  43. See Wayte v. United
    Search
  44. See United States v. Goodwin
    Search
  45. Brady v. United
    Search
  46. See Imbler v. Pachtman
    Search
  47. E.g., Blackledge v. Perry
    Search
  48. See Bushnell v. Rossetti
    Search
  49. See Hoines v. Barney's
    Search
  50. See Santobello v. New
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial