Skip to content
Try for free
Back to judgment

Citation network

Stringfellow Vs. Concerned Neighbors

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Mar 09, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

39 entries 1 linked 38 unlinked
Show
  1. Baltimore Contractors, Inc. Vs. Bodinger US Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1955
  2. Stringfellow v. Concerned
    Search
  3. Neighbors - 480 U.S. 370 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Stringfellow v. Concerned
    Search
  4. Neighbors, 480 U.S. 370 (1987) Stringfellow v. Concerned
    Search
  5. its opinion, however, concluding that the holding was inconsistent with Ninth Circuit precedent. Relying on California v. Block
    Search
  6. of the intervention application, and ultimately held that CNA must be allowed to intervene as of right. United States v. Stringfellow
    Search
  7. See Catlin v. United
    Search
  8. important and sufficiently separate from the underlying dispute that immediate appeal should be available. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  9. Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay
    Search
  10. U. S. 463 , 437 U. S. 468 (1978) (footnote omitted). See also Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord
    Search
  11. normally has the right to appeal an adverse final judgment by a Page 480 U. S. 376 trial court. See Fishgold v. Sullivan
    Search
  12. Kartell v. Blue
    Search
  13. See Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller
    Search
  14. putative intervenor from becoming a party in any respect, the order is subject to immediate review. Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore
    Search
  15. Carson v. American
    Search
  16. Brands, Inc., 450 U. S. 79 , 450 U. S. 84 (1981) (quoting Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger
    Search
  17. trial judges to supervise pretrial and trial procedures without undue interference. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord
    Search
  18. and orderly trials would be frustrated, rather than furthered, by piecemeal review. See Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller
    Search
  19. See Kartell v. Blue
    Search
  20. Shore v. Parklane
    Search
  21. Wheeler v. American
    Search
  22. that requested injunctive relief beyond that which was sought by the government plaintiffs. See United States v. Stringfellow
    Search
  23. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord
    Search
  24. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol
    Search
  25. Community Broadcasting of Boston, Inc. v. FCC
    Search
  26. Kerr v. United
    Search
  27. La Buy v. Howes
    Search
  28. Hamilton v. Morial
    Search
  29. and such an order is not appealable absent abuse of discretion. Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore
    Search
  30. Kerr v. United
    Search
  31. U.S. Supreme Court Stringfellow v. Concerned
    Search
  32. California v. Block
    Search
  33. United States v. Stringfellow
    Search
  34. Cohen v. Beneficial
    Search
  35. See Fishgold v. Sullivan
    Search
  36. Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore
    Search
  37. Wheeler v. American
    Search
  38. See United States v. Stringfellow
    Search
  39. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales