Citation network
Truesdale Vs. Aiken
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 23, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 527 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Truesdale v. AikenSearch
-
U.S. 527 (1987) Truesdale v. AikenSearch
-
for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is reversed. Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
Skipper v. SouthSearch
-
Carolina, 476 U. S. 1 (1986). See also United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
certiorari and summarily reverses a decision of the South Carolina Supreme Court that had refused to apply Skipper v. SouthSearch
-
law decisions retroactively to federal habeas corpus petitions is the analysis set forth by Justice Harlan in Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
U. S. 681 -695 (1971) (opinion concurring in judgment in Mackey and dissenting from judgment in Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 401 U. S. 646 (1971)). See Griffith v. KentuckySearch
-
Application of these principles to this case is not simple. Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
U. S. 586 (1978), and Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
s conviction became final. Accordingly, under the retroactivity principles adopted in our recent decision in Griffith v. KentuckySearch
-
at a capital sentencing proceeding, relevant evidence that tends to lessen the defendant's culpability. Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
id. at 401 U. S. 693 (quoting Palko v. ConnecticutSearch
-
The Court supports this conclusion by reference to the statement in United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Carolina, 476 U. S. 1 , 476 U. S. 5 (1986) (quoting Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
I am not the first to note the difficulty of making these determinations. See Desist v. UnitedSearch
-
Mackey v. UnitedSearch
-
opinion of Harlan, J., concurring in judgment in Mackey and dissenting from judgment in Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Truesdale v. AikenSearch
-
Lockett v. OhioSearch
-
United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Williams v. UnitedSearch
-
See Griffith v. KentuckySearch
-
and Eddings v. OklahomaSearch
-
Griffith v. KentuckySearch
-
Jurek v. TexasSearch
-
See Desist v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial