Citation network
Johnson Vs. Transportation Agency
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Mar 25, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Johnson v. TransportationSearch
-
Agency - 480 U.S. 616 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. TransportationSearch
-
Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987) Johnson v. TransportationSearch
-
factor in her selection, and that the Agency's Plan was invalid under the criterion announced in Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
the Agency justified its decision on the basis of its Affirmative Action Plan, the criteria announced in Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
note that petitioner bears the burden of establishing the invalidity of the Agency's Plan. Only last Term, in Wygant v. JacksonSearch
-
of Title VII. This case also fits readily within the analytical framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSearch
-
labor market or general population is appropriate in analyzing jobs that require no special expertise, see Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
extent of imbalance in truck driving positions), or training programs designed to provide expertise, see Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
should be with those in the labor force who possess the relevant qualifications. See Hazelwood School District v. UnitedSearch
-
in the craft training program were exclusively for blacks, and to the consent decree upheld last Term in Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
approvingly noted by JUSTICE POWELL in Regents of University of California v. BakkeSearch
-
the adoption and implementation of a voluntary affirmative action plan under the Equal Protection Clause. See Wygant v. JacksonSearch
-
General Electric Co. v. GilbertSearch
-
Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. EEOCSearch
-
See also Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
Alexander v. Gardner-DenverSearch
-
redress an employer's past discrimination, see post at 480 U. S. 664 -665, was rejected in Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
post at 480 U. S. 664 -668, our decisions last term in Firefighters, supra, and Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOCSearch
-
standard. See, e.g., Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
As I explained in my separate opinion in Regents of University of California v. BakkeSearch
-
U. S. 265 , 438 U. S. 412 -418 (1978), and as the Court forcefully stated in McDonald v. SantaSearch
-
case. But it has not done so. Page 480 U. S. 644 In the Bakke case in 1978 and again in Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
rhetoric used by the Senators and Congressmen who enacted the bill is now controlling. Thus, as was true in Runyon v. McCrarySearch
-
Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
Griggs v. DukeSearch
-
McDonald v. SantaSearch
-
why the plan did not impose a special hardship on white employees or white applicants for employment. Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
JUSTICE O'CONNOR, concurring in the judgment. In Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
U.S. at 443 U. S. 202 (quoting United States v. PublicSearch
-
intent to root out invidious discrimination against any person on the basis of race or gender, McDonald v. SantaSearch
-
consistent emphasis on the value of voluntary efforts to further the antidiscrimination purposes of Title VII. Wygant v. JacksonSearch
-
workers in Title VII appears substantially similar to this Court's resolution of these same concerns in Wygant v. JacksonSearch
-
doubt that the absence of black craftworkers was the result of the exclusion of blacks from craft unions. Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
positions such as membership in craft unions -- is to the total percentage of blacks in the labor force. See Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
States, 431 U. S. 324 (1977). cf. Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOCSearch
-
suggest past discrimination for purposes of proving a Title VII prima facie case. See Hazelwood School District v. UnitedSearch
-
Wygant v. JacksonSearch
-
Teamsters v. UnitedSearch
-
by other employers, this holding would contradict a decision of this Court rendered only last Term. Wygant v. JacksonSearch
-
are at least as stringent as those in the Constitution. See Regents of University of California v. BakkeSearch
-
today's decision also disregards the limitations carefully expressed in last Term's opinions in Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOCSearch
-
Id. at 476 U. S. 499 (dissenting). See also Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
evil against which the plan is legitimately (according to the majority) directed. As originally used in Steelworkers v. WeberSearch
-
itself, see 443 U.S. at 443 U. S. 200 , 443 U. S. 204 , and in later decisions, see Firefighters v. ClevelandSearch
-
of POWELL, J.), this Court has repeatedly emphasized that Weber involved only a private employer. See Williams v. NewSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial