Citation network
Pilot Life Ins. Co. Vs. Dedeaux
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 06, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 41 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
U.S. 41 (1987) Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
an employee benefit plan, and therefore fall under ERISA's preemption clause. Cf. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed, primarily on the basis of this Court's decision in Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U. S. 202 , 471 U. S. 208 (1985), quoting Malone v. WhiteSearch
-
Motor Corp., 435 U. S. 497 , 435 U. S. 504 (1978), quoting Retail Clerks v. SchermerhornSearch
-
Alessi v. Raybestos-ManhattanSearch
-
Inc., 451 U. S. 504 , 451 U. S. 523 (1981). As we explained in Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Id. at 29933. See also Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
a). In both Metropolitan Life, supra, and Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
Metropolitan Life, supra, at 471 U. S. 739 , quoting Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
third, whether the practice is limited to entities within the insurance industry. Union Labor Life Ins. Co. v. PirenoSearch
-
See Nood v. MoffettSearch
-
In American Railway Express Co. v. BaileySearch
-
In Standard Life Insurance Co. v. VealSearch
-
So.2d 239 (1977), the Mississippi Supreme Court, citing D. L. Fair Lumber Co. v. WeemsSearch
-
American Railway Express Co. v. BaileySearch
-
supra, and Hood v. MoffettSearch
-
in order for punitive Page 481 U. S. 50 damages to be recoverable. See, e.g., Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. TompkinsSearch
-
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SimpsonSearch
-
Consolidated American Life Ins. Co. v. TocheSearch
-
Gulf Guaranty Life Ins. Co. v. KelleySearch
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. RobertsSearch
-
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. SmithSearch
-
Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. v. CrewsSearch
-
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi, Inc. v. CampbellSearch
-
from general principles of tort and contract law available in any Mississippi breach of contract case. Cf. Hart v. OrionSearch
-
Hamilton Life Ins. Co. v. RepublicSearch
-
U. S. 36 , 479 U. S. 43 (1986), quoting Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. TallentireSearch
-
U. S. 207 , 477 U. S. 221 (1986) (quoting Mastro Plastics Corp. v. NLRBSearch
-
U. S. 270 , 350 U. S. 285 (1956) (in turn quoting United States v. HeirsSearch
-
g). See Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. RussellSearch
-
Russell, supra, at 473 U. S. 147 , quoting Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. TransportSearch
-
was first analyzed in Teamsters v. LucasSearch
-
Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. ConstructionSearch
-
Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal., 463 U. S. 1 , 463 U. S. 23 (1983), referring to Avco Corp. v. MachinistsSearch
-
a) could be supplemented or supplanted by varying state laws. In Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. DedeauxSearch
-
Cf. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Malone v. WhiteSearch
-
and Shaw v. DeltaSearch
-
D. L. Fair Lumber Co. v. WeemsSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial