Citation network
Pennzoil Vs. Texaco, Inc.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 06, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Pennzoil v. TexacoSearch
-
Inc. - 481 U.S. 1 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Pennzoil v. TexacoSearch
-
Inc., 481 U.S. 1 (1987) Pennzoil v. TexacoSearch
-
inter alia, that the Federal District Court should abstain from hearing the case under the doctrine of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
It further contended that the court should abstain Page 481 U. S. 7 under the doctrine of Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
an appeal from the Texas trial court, and that the District Court had no jurisdiction under the principles of Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
Trust Co., 263 U. S. 413 (1923), and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
See Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
evaluated the constitutionality of the Texas lien and bond requirements by applying the test articulated in Mathews v. EldridgeSearch
-
with the state court action. Id. at 1144 (quoting District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
F.2d at 1145. Relying on its reading of Lugar v. EdmondsonSearch
-
is an exception to the Anti-Injunction Act, see Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
court held that abstention was unnecessary. First, it addressed Pullman abstention, see Railroad Comm'n of Texas v. PullmanSearch
-
S. 10 II The courts below should have abstained under the principles of federalism enunciated in Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
of the federal judicial power would disregard the comity between the States and the National Government. E.g., Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
U. S. 415 , 442 U. S. 428 (1979). See Trainor v. HernandezSearch
-
interests in administering certain aspects of Page 481 U. S. 13 their judicial systems. E.g., Trainor v. HernandezSearch
-
Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. GardenSearch
-
State Bar Assn., 457 U. S. 423 , 457 U. S. 432 (1982). In Juidice v. VailSearch
-
U.S. at 442 U. S. 432 . See Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
quoting Fenner v. BoykinSearch
-
apparently made no effort under Texas law to secure the relief sought in this case. Cf. Middlesex County Ethics Comm. v. GardenSearch
-
will interpret ambiguities in state procedural law to bar presentation of federal claims. Cf. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n v. DaytonSearch
-
in each of Texas' six Constitutions, dating back to the Constitution of the Republic of Texas in 1836. See LeCroy v. HanlonSearch
-
Nelson v. KrusenSearch
-
Thulemeyer v. JonesSearch
-
Judgment entered in an action in the District Court for the 151st Judicial District of Texas entitled Pennzoil Company v. TexacoSearch
-
even if there are no pending state proceedings in which the question could be raised. See Railroad Comm'n of Texas v. PullmanSearch
-
mandate Pullman abstention are relevant to a court's decision whether to abstain under Younger. Cf. Moore v. SimsSearch
-
See LeCroy v. HanlonSearch
-
Brennan, State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights, 90 Harv.L.Rev. 489 (1977)). See also Dillingham v. PutnamSearch
-
requires appellants to post bond in the full amount of the judgment. E.g., Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. StreetmanSearch
-
Texaco's claims that Rule 364 violates the Federal Constitution. See Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
Texaco cannot escape Younger abstention by failing to assert its state remedies in a timely manner. See Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
arguably have the authority to suspend the supersedeas requirement to protect their appellate jurisdiction. See Pace v. McEwenSearch
-
with his conclusion that the District Court was not required to abstain under the principles enunciated in Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
action alleging violation of federal constitutional rights. See Huffman v. PursueSearch
-
quoting Mitchum v. FosterSearch
-
Ante at 481 U. S. 13 (quoting Juidice v. VailSearch
-
to waive the bond and lien requirements under Texas law, without asking the State of Texas for permission. See Yandell v. TarrantSearch
-
United Benefit Fire Insurance Co. v. MetropolitanSearch
-
Ante at 481 U. S. 10 (quoting Younger v. HarrisSearch
-
Furthermore, I reject Pennzoil's contention that District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSearch
-
U. S. 462 (1983), and Rooker v. FidelitySearch
-
the merits of the state court judgment. National Socialist Party v. SkokieSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial