Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Cruz Vs. New York

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 21, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

57 entries 1 linked 56 unlinked
Show
  1. Richardson Vs. Marsh US Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1987
  2. Cruz v. New
    Search
  3. York - 481 U.S. 186 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Cruz v. New
    Search
  4. York, 481 U.S. 186 (1987) Cruz v. New
    Search
  5. U.S. 186 Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York Syllabus Under Bruton V. United
    Search
  6. New York Court of Appeals affirmed petitioner's conviction, adopting the reasoning of the plurality opinion in Parker v. Randolph
    Search
  7. joined, post, p. 481 U. S. 194 . JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In Bruton v. United
    Search
  8. their joint trial, even if the jury is instructed to consider that confession only against the codefendant. In Parker v. Randolph
    Search
  9. extended against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, includes the right to cross-examine witnesses. See Pointer v. Texas
    Search
  10. despite the lack of opportunity for cross-examination) be admitted as evidence against the defendant, see Lee v. Illinois
    Search
  11. and the determinability of these facts in advance of trial, Richardson v. Marsh
    Search
  12. codefendant's confession incriminating the defendant is not directly admissible against the defendant, see Lee v. Illinois
    Search
  13. and may be considered on appeal in assessing whether any Confrontation Clause violation was harmless, see Harrington v. California
    Search
  14. Justice White, With Whom the Chief Justice, Justice Powell, and Justice O'Connor Join, Dissenting. Bruton V. United
    Search
  15. WHITE, J., dissenting). Confessions of defendants have profound impact on juries, so much that we held in Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  16. Holmgren v. Page
    Search
  17. Crawford v. United
    Search
  18. of the Bruton decision. Ante at 481 U. S. 193 . But Richardson v. Marsh
    Search
  19. have drawn unfavorable inferences from the challenged confession when considered together with other evidence. Marsh v. Richardson
    Search
  20. verdicts and the effect of severance on already-overburdened state and federal court systems. See also Richardson v. Marsh
    Search
  21. post at 481 U. S. 209 -210. I thus adhere to the views expressed by the plurality in Parker v. Randolph
    Search
  22. confessed, and I would not extend its holding to cases where the jury has heard the defendant's own confession. Lee v. Illinois
    Search
  23. U. S. 530 (1986), and Ohio v. Roberts
    Search
  24. postal funds from a jewelry store that operated a contract branch for the United States Post Office Department. Evans v. United
    Search
  25. him only at a second lineup, at a time when she suspected that he had been part of the previous lineup. App. in Bruton v. United
    Search
  26. in nature, and, in view of the fact that it imposes significant burdens on the prosecution, see Richardson v. Marsh
    Search
  27. cases, the Second, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits follow the course the Court rejects. United States ex rel. Catanzaro v. Mancusi
    Search
  28. United States v. Paternina-Vergara
    Search
  29. United States v. Spinks
    Search
  30. United States v. Kroesser
    Search
  31. F.2d 1509 (CA11 1984). The Fourth and Fifth Circuits lean in that direction, United States v. Smith
    Search
  32. Mack v. Maggio
    Search
  33. United States v. Miller
    Search
  34. and the Tenth Circuit's view is that any difference between the two views is only a legal nicety, Metropolis v. Turner
    Search
  35. F.2d 207 (1971). The Third, Sixth, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits take the harmless error route. United States v. DiGilio
    Search
  36. Hodges v. Rose
    Search
  37. United States v. Parker
    Search
  38. United States v. Espericueta-Reyes
    Search
  39. In Bruton v. United
    Search
  40. U.S. Supreme Court Cruz v. New
    Search
  41. Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York Syllabus Under Bruton V. United
    Search
  42. Parker v. Randolph
    Search
  43. of the Court. In Bruton v. United
    Search
  44. In Parker v. Randolph
    Search
  45. See Pointer v. Texas
    Search
  46. Lee v. Illinois
    Search
  47. Harrington v. California
    Search
  48. Bruton v. United
    Search
  49. Jackson v. Denno
    Search
  50. But Richardson v. Marsh
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial