Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Tison Vs. Arizona

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 21, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

64 entries 6 linked 58 unlinked
Show
  1. Enmund Vs. Florida US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1982
  2. Gregg Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jul 02, 1976
  3. Coker Vs. Georgia US Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1977
  4. O'Neil Vs. Vermont US Supreme Court · Apr 04, 1892
  5. Cabana Vs. Bullock US Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1986
  6. Solem Vs. Helm US Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1983
  7. U.S. 137 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Tison v. Arizona
    Search
  8. U.S. 137 (1987) Tison v. Arizona
    Search
  9. petitioners collaterally attacked their death sentences in state postconviction proceedings, alleging that Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  10. wounds. We hold that the Arizona Supreme Court applied an erroneous standard in making the findings required by Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  11. Ricky, and Raymond, Gary's brother Joseph, and other relatives made plans to help Gary Tison escape again. See State v. Dorothy
    Search
  12. Petitioners then collaterally attacked their death sentences in state postconviction proceedings, alleging that Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  13. State v. Emery
    Search
  14. II In Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  15. Weems v. United
    Search
  16. States, 217 U. S. 349 , 217 U. S. 371 (1910) (quoting O'Neil v. Vermont
    Search
  17. Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  18. Woodson v. North
    Search
  19. supra, at 458 U. S. 798 (quoting Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  20. in the felony murder was so attenuated, and since there was no proof that Enmund had any culpable mental state, Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  21. Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  22. of reckless indifference to human life. We take the facts as the Arizona Supreme Court has given them to us. Cabana v. Bullock
    Search
  23. suggests that our society does not reject the death penalty as grossly excessive under these circumstances, Gregg v. Georgia
    Search
  24. Coker v. Georgia
    Search
  25. Clines v. State
    Search
  26. Deputy v. State
    Search
  27. Ruffin v. State
    Search
  28. People v. Davis
    Search
  29. Selvage v. State
    Search
  30. Allen v. State
    Search
  31. killings and felony murders. 3 Pa.Laws 1794, ch. 1766, pp. 186-187 (1810). More recently, in Lockett v. Ohio
    Search
  32. Eddings v. Oklahoma
    Search
  33. U. S. 104 (1982) (adopting position of Lockett plurality). In Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  34. below and remand for determination of the latter in further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Cabana v. Bullock
    Search
  35. Together with Tison v. Arizona
    Search
  36. an unconstitutionally broad construction to the aggravating factors in its capital sentencing statute. See Godfrey v. Georgia
    Search
  37. December 4, 1984, decision of the Arizona Supreme Court to execute petitioners in conflict with the holding of Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  38. the death penalty to defendants who commit a second unrelated murder or murder a correctional officer. See Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  39. The state statutes discussed in Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  40. capital punishment for felony murder simpliciter on the ground that the California Supreme Court, in Carlos v. Superior
    Search
  41. light of perceived federal constitutional limitations stemming from our then-recent decision in Enmund. See Carlos v. Superior
    Search
  42. State v. Tison
    Search
  43. the theory of felony murder. After the decision of the Arizona Supreme Court, this Court addressed, in Enmund v. Florida
    Search
  44. but the Florida Supreme Court had held him strictly liable for the killings under the felony murder doctrine. Enmund v. State
    Search
  45. independently and fairly to consider all the relevant evidence before applying the Court's new standard. See Cabana v. Bullock
    Search
  46. Enmund determination can be made only by the trial court following an evidentiary hearing. See Cabana v. Bullock
    Search
  47. conduct a proportionality review of the kind performed in past cases raising a proportionality question, e.g., Solem v. Helm
    Search
  48. Morissette v. United
    Search
  49. U.S. Supreme Court Tison v. Arizona
    Search
  50. See State v. Dorothy
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial