Citation network
Ark. Writers' Project Vs. Ragland
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 22, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 221 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Ark. Writers' Project v. RaglandSearch
-
U.S. 221 (1987) Arkansas Writers' Project v. RaglandSearch
-
articles on a variety of subjects, including religion and sports. In 1984, relying on Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
the validity of Arkansas' exemption structure. Record 46-47. Subsequently, in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Ibid., quoting Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
of this Court, and therefore does not meet the requirements for standing set forth in Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
effectively insulate under-inclusive statutes from constitutional challenge, a proposition we soundly rejected in Orr v. OrrSearch
-
situated were exempt from the operation of a state law adversely affecting the claimant. See, e.g., Armco Inc. v. HardestySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySearch
-
Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
Police Dept. of Chicago v. PageSearch
-
U. S. 230 Mosley, 408 U.S. at 408 U. S. 95 . See also Carey v. BrownSearch
-
Regan v. TimeSearch
-
FCC v. LeagueSearch
-
for imposing a tax is entirely incompatible with the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press. See Regan v. TimeSearch
-
magazines. We rejected a similar distinction between content and viewpoint restrictions in Consolidated Edison Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Id. at 447 U. S. 537 . See FCC v. LeagueSearch
-
Metromedia, Inc. v. SanSearch
-
Regan v. TaxationSearch
-
U. S. 540 , 461 U. S. 553 (1983) (BLACKMUN, J., concurring). See also Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. VirginiaSearch
-
Martinez v. CaliforniaSearch
-
claims are obviously intertwined with interests arising under the Equal Protection Clause. See Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySearch
-
implicates freedom of the press, we analyze it primarily in First Amendment terms. See Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
A Remedy for Unconstitutional State Taxation, 96 Yale L.J. 414, 420-421 (1985). See also Spencer v. SouthSearch
-
Of course, an affirmance by an equally divided Court is not entitled to precedential weight. See Neil v. BiggersSearch
-
see ante at 481 U. S. 229 (quoting Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySearch
-
See my separate opinions in Consolidated Edison Co. v. PublicSearch
-
and Regan v. TimeSearch
-
FCC v. LeagueSearch
-
to sustain the tax scheme against ordinary equal protection attack, see, e.g., Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSearch
-
Police Department of Chicago v. MosleySearch
-
U. S. 461 -462 (1980) (same). Here, as in the Court's earlier decision in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
lobbying even though veterans' organizations received exemption regardless of lobbying activities). See also Cammarano v. UnitedSearch
-
controversial issue of foreign policy. Political speech has been accorded special protection elsewhere. See, e.g., FCC v. LeagueSearch
-
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCCSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ark. Writers' Project v. RaglandSearch
-
Arkansas Writers' Project v. RaglandSearch
-
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. MinnesotaSearch
-
Valley Forge Christian College v. AmericansSearch
-
See Regan v. TimeSearch
-
Consolidated Edison Co. v. PublicSearch
-
See FCC v. LeagueSearch
-
Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. VirginiaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial