Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Tull Vs. United States

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Apr 28, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

52 entries 5 linked 47 unlinked
Show
  1. Dairy Queen, Inc. Vs. Wood US Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1962
  2. Ross Vs. Bernhard US Supreme Court · Feb 02, 1970
  3. Curtis Vs. Loether US Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1974
  4. Colgrove Vs. Battin US Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1973
  5. United States Vs. Regan US Supreme Court · Jan 05, 1914
  6. Tull v. United
    Search
  7. States - 481 U.S. 412 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Tull v. United
    Search
  8. States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987) Tull v. United
    Search
  9. pp. 232-233 (2d ed.1971)). The Court of Appeals in this case also found unpersuasive the dictum in Hepner v. United
    Search
  10. States, 213 U. S. 103 , 213 U. S. 115 (1909), and in United States v. Regan
    Search
  11. Ibid. In Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational
    Search
  12. analogous to 18th-century cases tried in courts of equity or admiralty do not require a jury trial. See Parsons v. Bedford
    Search
  13. not only to common law forms of action, but also to causes of action created by congressional enactment. See Curtis v. Loether
    Search
  14. actions brought in the courts of England prior to the merger of the courts of law and equity. See, e.g., Pernell v. Southall
    Search
  15. sought, and Page 481 U. S. 418 determine whether it is legal or equitable in nature. See, e.g., Curtis v. Loether
    Search
  16. a particular species of an action in debt that was within the jurisdiction of the courts of law. See, e.g., Atcheson v. Everitt
    Search
  17. Calcraft v. Gibbs
    Search
  18. the civil penalty suit as a particular type of an action in debt, requiring a jury trial. See, e.g., United States v. Mundell
    Search
  19. Jacob v. United
    Search
  20. Lees v. United
    Search
  21. of action in debt requiring trial by jury. It was against this historical background that the Court, in Hepner v. United
    Search
  22. U.S. at 213 U. S. 115 (emphasis added). In United States v. Regan
    Search
  23. action is a better analogy than an action in debt is debatable. But we need not decide the question. As Pernell v. Southall
    Search
  24. search for the nearest 18th-century analog. See Ross v. Bernhard
    Search
  25. analogous common law cause of action in determining whether the Seventh Amendment guarantees a jury trial. Curtis v. Loether
    Search
  26. compensation or restore the status quo, were issued by courts of law, not courts of equity. See, e.g., Curtis v. Loether
    Search
  27. Steelworkers v. United
    Search
  28. Porter v. Warner
    Search
  29. may award monetary restitution as an adjunct to injunctive relief, it may not enforce civil penalties. See Porter v. Warner
    Search
  30. quoting Scott, Trial by Jury and the Reform of Civil Procedure, 31 Harv.L.Rev. 669, 671 (1918)). See also Galloway v. United
    Search
  31. to fix the penalty by statute has not been questioned, and it was also the British practice, see, e.g., Atcheson v. Everitt
    Search
  32. States, the action to recover civil penalties usually seeks the amount fixed by Congress. See, e.g., United States v. Regan
    Search
  33. Hepner v. United
    Search
  34. the Clean Water Act. These are the kinds of calculations traditionally performed by judges. See Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
    Search
  35. Pernell v. Southall
    Search
  36. in holding that the Seventh Amendment is not applicable to administrative proceedings. See, e.g., Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational
    Search
  37. Pernell v. Southall
    Search
  38. taking into consideration the nature of the cause of action and the remedy as two important factors. See Pernell v. Southall
    Search
  39. is similar to the remedy of punitive damages, another legal remedy that is not a fixed fine. See, e.g., Curtis v. Loether
    Search
  40. U.S. Supreme Court Tull v. United
    Search
  41. See Parsons v. Bedford
    Search
  42. See Curtis v. Loether
    Search
  43. Atcheson v. Everitt
    Search
  44. United States v. Mundell
    Search
  45. In United States v. Regan
    Search
  46. As Pernell v. Southall
    Search
  47. See Ross v. Bernhard
    Search
  48. See Porter v. Warner
    Search
  49. Galloway v. United
    Search
  50. See Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial