Citation network
United States Vs. Johnson
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- May 18, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
U.S. 681 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
U.S. 681 (1987) United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Syllabus Under Feres V. UnitedSearch
-
delivered the opinion of the Court This case presents the question whether the doctrine established in Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
F.2d at 1539 (citing Uptegrove v. UnitedSearch
-
s suggestion for rehearing en banc. The en banc court found that this Court's recent decision in United States v. ShearerSearch
-
rationales underlying the Feres decision. See Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. Page 481 U. S. 689 v. UnitedSearch
-
Feres, 340 U.S. at 340 U. S. 143 (quoting United States v. StandardSearch
-
Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
States, supra, at 431 U. S. 673 . See Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
In addition to the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Uptegrove v. UnitedSearch
-
See United States v. BrownSearch
-
Id. at 340 U. S. 143 -144 (quoting United States v. StandardSearch
-
added). Although one decision since Feres noted the military status of the tortfeasors, see United States v. BrownSearch
-
language that consistently has been repeated in recent decisions describing the Feres doctrine. See Chappell v. WallaceSearch
-
Dalehite v. UnitedSearch
-
Potts v. UnitedSearch
-
Warner v. UnitedSearch
-
Jaffee v. UnitedSearch
-
Lewis v. UnitedSearch
-
Carter v. CheyenneSearch
-
Woodside v. UnitedSearch
-
Uptegrove v. UnitedSearch
-
Watkins v. UnitedSearch
-
Nass v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. LeeSearch
-
Sheppard v. UnitedSearch
-
Layne v. UnitedSearch
-
United Air Lines, Inc. v. WienerSearch
-
serviceman injured in part due to alleged CAA employee negligence), cert. dismissed sub nom. United Air Lines, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
BRENNAN, JUSTICE MARSHALL, and JUSTICE STEVENS join, dissenting. As it did almost four decades ago in Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
encounter with an FTCA suit brought by a serviceman, we gave effect to the plain meaning of the statute. In Brooks v. UnitedSearch
-
permit suits for service-related injuries. because they would unduly interfere with military discipline. United States v. BrownSearch
-
rationale. See Rayonier, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
-
Indian Towing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
the military's need for uniformity in its governing standards. See, e.g., Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
S. 696 recovery cannot possibly be worse than (what Feres provides) uniform nonrecovery. See United States v. MunizSearch
-
and permitting civilians to recover for injuries caused by military negligence. See, e.g., Indian Towing Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court United States v. JohnsonSearch
-
Feres v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. StandardSearch
-
See Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
United States v. BrownSearch
-
See Chappell v. WallaceSearch
-
United Air Lines, Inc. v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial