Citation network
Turner Vs. Safley
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 01, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 78 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Turner v. SafleySearch
-
U.S. 78 (1987) Turner v. SafleySearch
-
The lower courts erred in ruling that Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
regulation. 482 U. S. 94-99. (a) Prisoners have a constitutionally protected right to marry under Zablocki v. RedhailSearch
-
sufficient important attributes of marriage remain to form a constitutionally protected relationship. Butler v. WilsonSearch
-
and order finding both the correspondence and marriage regulations unconstitutional. The court, relying on Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
scrutiny in evaluating the constitutionality of the Missouri correspondence and marriage regulations. Under Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
certiorari, 476 U.S. 1139 (1986). II We begin, as did the courts below, with our decision in Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
example, prisoners retain the constitutional right to petition the government for the redress of grievances, Johnson v. AverySearch
-
are protected against invidious racial discrimination by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Lee v. WashingtonSearch
-
and they enjoy the protections of due process, Wolff v. McDonnellSearch
-
The first of these, Pell v. ProcunierSearch
-
U.S. at 417 U. S. 827 . The next case to consider a claim of prisoners' rights was Jones v. NorthSearch
-
Id. at 433 U. S. 129 . Page 482 U. S. 87 Bell v. WolfishSearch
-
Id. at 441 U. S. 551 . And in Block v. RutherfordSearch
-
however, why hardback books, which can be scanned for contraband by electronic devices and fluoroscopes, see Bell v. WolfishSearch
-
Jones v. NorthSearch
-
between the prison regulation and the legitimate governmental interest put forward to justify it. Block v. RutherfordSearch
-
First Amendment rights operated in a neutral fashion, without regard to the content of the expression. See Pell v. ProcunierSearch
-
Bell v. WolffishSearch
-
remain available for the exercise of the asserted right, see Jones v. NorthSearch
-
prison staff, courts should be particularly deferential to the informed discretion of corrections officials. Cf. Jones v. NorthSearch
-
Finally, the absence of ready alternatives is evidence of the reasonableness of a prison regulation. See Block v. RutherfordSearch
-
As a result, the correspondence rights asserted by respondents, like the organizational activities at issue in Jones v. NorthSearch
-
Page 482 U. S. 95 protected right. They concede that the decision to marry is a fundamental right under Zablocki v. RedhailSearch
-
U. S. 374 (1978), and Loving v. VirginiaSearch
-
are sufficient to form a constitutionally protected marital relationship in the prison context. Our decision in Butler v. WilsonSearch
-
U.S. 953 (1974), summarily affirming Johnson v. RockefellerSearch
-
Mandel v. BradleySearch
-
See Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
it is the least restrictive alternative test of Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
a plainly improper appellate encroachment into the factfinding domain of the District Court. See Icicle Seafoods, Inc. v. WorthingtonSearch
-
that the restrictions are needed to further an important governmental interest. Judge Kaufman's opinion in Abdul Wali v. CoughlinSearch
-
violation, the District Court has broad discretion in fashioning an appropriate remedy. Cf. United States v. ParadiseSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Turner v. SafleySearch
-
Butler v. WilsonSearch
-
Under Procunier v. MartinezSearch
-
Johnson v. AverySearch
-
the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Lee v. WashingtonSearch
-
See Pell v. ProcunierSearch
-
Cf. Jones v. NorthSearch
-
See Block v. RutherfordSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial