Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Bowen Vs. Yuckert

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 08, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

49 entries 1 linked 48 unlinked
Show
  1. Heckler Vs. Campbell US Supreme Court · May 16, 1983
  2. U.S. 137 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Bowen v. Yuckert
    Search
  3. U.S. 137 (1987) Bowen v. Yuckert
    Search
  4. g). See generally Bowen v. City
    Search
  5. of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded without considering the substantiality of the evidence. Yuckert v. Heckler
    Search
  6. Yuckert v. Heckler
    Search
  7. U. S. 458 , 461 U. S. 466 (1983) (quoting Schweiker v. Gray
    Search
  8. See Heckler v. Campbell
    Search
  9. d)(5)(A)(1982 ed. and Supp. III). See Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  10. Bowen v. City
    Search
  11. of New York, 476 U.S. at 476 U. S. 486 , n. 14 (quoting City of New York v. Heckler
    Search
  12. s sequential evaluation process contribute to the uniformity and efficiency of disability determinations. Heckler v. Campbell
    Search
  13. Page 482 U. S. 155 v. The
    Search
  14. E.g., Valencia v. Heckler
    Search
  15. Francis v. Heckler
    Search
  16. Some Courts of Appeals have upheld the facial validity of the severity regulation. McDonald v. Secretary
    Search
  17. Hampton v. Bowen
    Search
  18. Farris v. Secretary
    Search
  19. Flynn v. Heckler
    Search
  20. have joined the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in holding the severity regulation invalid on its face. Wilson v. Secretary
    Search
  21. Johnson v. Heckler
    Search
  22. Brown v. Heckler
    Search
  23. Hansen v. Heckler
    Search
  24. the claimant is not required to bear the burden of showing that he is unable to perform his prior work. See Bluvband v. Heckler
    Search
  25. under the statute. Schweiker v. Gray
    Search
  26. we agreed that there was some ambiguity, we would defer to the Secretary's interpretation of the statute. See Heckler v. Campbell
    Search
  27. the heavy deference ordinarily paid to the Secretary's promulgation and application of his regulations, Schweiker v. Gray
    Search
  28. of all claims were denied at this stage. See Baeder v. Heckler
    Search
  29. to disqualify those who are statutorily eligible. For example, in Illinois, after entry of the injunction in Johnson v. Heckler
    Search
  30. F.2d 1202 (CA7 1985), cert. pending sub nom. Bowen v. Johnson
    Search
  31. can be denied benefits without undertaking this vocational analysis. See Evans v. Heckler
    Search
  32. Estran v. Heckler
    Search
  33. Brady v. Heckler
    Search
  34. Dixon v. Heckler
    Search
  35. Wilson v. Secretary
    Search
  36. Baeder v. Heckler
    Search
  37. McDonald v. Secretary
    Search
  38. Evans v. Heckler
    Search
  39. Stone v. Heckler
    Search
  40. Salmi v. Secretary
    Search
  41. McCruter v. Bowen
    Search
  42. U.S. Supreme Court Bowen v. Yuckert
    Search
  43. Schweiker v. Gray
    Search
  44. and Supp. III). See Mathews v. Eldridge
    Search
  45. City of New York v. Heckler
    Search
  46. See Bluvband v. Heckler
    Search
  47. See Baeder v. Heckler
    Search
  48. Bowen v. Johnson
    Search
  49. See Evans v. Heckler
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial