Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Miller Vs. Florida

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 09, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

41 entries 2 linked 39 unlinked
Show
  1. Weaver Vs. Graham US Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1981
  2. Portley Vs. Grossman US Supreme Court · Feb 01, 1980
  3. U.S. 423 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Miller v. Florida
    Search
  4. U.S. 423 (1987) Miller v. Florida
    Search
  5. State v. Mischler
    Search
  6. Id. at 6, 11. On appeal, the Florida District Court of Appeal, relying on this Court's decision in Weaver v. Graham
    Search
  7. Court of Florida reversed. 488 So.2d 820 (1986). In a summary opinion, the court concluded that its decision in State v. Jackson
    Search
  8. under Dobbert v. Florida
    Search
  9. cl. 1. Our understanding of what is meant by ex post facto largely derives from the case of Calder v. Bull
    Search
  10. Id. at 3 U. S. 390 (emphasis omitted). Accord, Dobbert v. Florida
    Search
  11. supra, at 432 U. S. 292 , quoting Beazell v. Ohio
    Search
  12. id. at 3 U. S. 399 -400 (Iredell, J.). See also Malloy v. South
    Search
  13. James v. United
    Search
  14. supra, at 450 U. S. 28 -29. See Calder v. Bull
    Search
  15. Id. at 450 U. S. 29 . We have also held in Dobbert v. Florida
    Search
  16. Id. at 432 U. S. 293 . See Beazell v. Ohio
    Search
  17. Tr. of Oral Arg. 29. This argument, however, is foreclosed by our decision in Lindsey v. Washington
    Search
  18. the sentencing judge's discretion. Brief for Respondent 35. See, e.g., Wallace v. Christensen
    Search
  19. Yamamoto v. United
    Search
  20. Dufresne v. Baer
    Search
  21. Warren v. United
    Search
  22. Parole Comm'n, 212 U.S.App.D.C. 137, 659 F.2d 183 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 950 (1982). See also Portley v. Grossman
    Search
  23. for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause. See, e.g., Wallace v. Christensen
    Search
  24. that retrospective application of the guidelines thus does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. See, e.g. Warren v. United
    Search
  25. and Page 482 U. S. 435 thus does not constitute an ex post facto violation. See, e.g., Dufresne v. Baer
    Search
  26. sentencing law is a law enacted by the Florida Legislature, and it has the force and effect of law. Cf. Williams v. State
    Search
  27. See State v. Mischler
    Search
  28. Williams v. State
    Search
  29. U.S. Supreme Court Miller v. Florida
    Search
  30. State v. Jackson
    Search
  31. Dobbert v. Florida
    Search
  32. of Calder v. Bull
    Search
  33. Accord, Dobbert v. Florida
    Search
  34. Beazell v. Ohio
    Search
  35. Malloy v. South
    Search
  36. See Calder v. Bull
    Search
  37. See Beazell v. Ohio
    Search
  38. Lindsey v. Washington
    Search
  39. Wallace v. Christensen
    Search
  40. Cf. Williams v. State
    Search
  41. Hopt v. Utah
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial