Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Caterpillar, Inc. Vs. Williams

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 09, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

42 entries 2 linked 40 unlinked
Show
  1. Allis-chalmers Corp. Vs. Lueck US Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1985
  2. Avco Corp. Vs. Machinists US Supreme Court · Apr 08, 1968
  3. U.S. 386 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams
    Search
  4. U.S. 386 (1987) Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams
    Search
  5. upon interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement. Pp. 482 U. S. 394 -395. (c) J. I. Case Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  6. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor
    Search
  7. U. S. 58 , 481 U. S. 63 (1987) (citing Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction
    Search
  8. exists only when a federal question is presented on the face of the plaintiff's properly pleaded complaint. See Gully v. First
    Search
  9. a). In Avco Corp. v. Machinists
    Search
  10. Electrical Workers v. Hechler
    Search
  11. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck
    Search
  12. Corp., supra, at 471 U. S. 212 . Caterpillar next relies on this Court's decision in J. I. Case Co. v. NLRB
    Search
  13. a). See Machinists v. Wisconsin
    Search
  14. Employment Relations Comm'n, 427 U. S. 132 , 427 U. S. 146 (1976) (quoting Teamsters v. Morton
    Search
  15. the NLRA, and is therefore preempted. See San Diego Building Page 482 U. S. 398 Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  16. oral and written assurances of stable and continuous employment, and an employer's personnel practices. See Pugh v. See's
    Search
  17. Cleary v. American
    Search
  18. citations omitted). This analysis is squarely contradicted by our decision in Avco Corp. v. Machinists
    Search
  19. judgment, we reject its reasoning insofar as it is inconsistent with Avco. See also Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction
    Search
  20. See The Fair v. Kohler
    Search
  21. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson
    Search
  22. Great North R. Co. v. Alexander
    Search
  23. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor
    Search
  24. Oneida Indian Nation v. County
    Search
  25. whether an examination of the collective bargaining agreement is truly required by California law. See Youngman v. Nevada
    Search
  26. Cf. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie
    Search
  27. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. NLRB
    Search
  28. Cook v. Georgetown
    Search
  29. Medlin v. Boeing
    Search
  30. U.S. Supreme Court Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams
    Search
  31. J. I. Case Co. V. Nlrb
    Search
  32. Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction
    Search
  33. See Gully v. First
    Search
  34. In Avco Corp. v. Machinists
    Search
  35. See Machinists v. Wisconsin
    Search
  36. Teamsters v. Morton
    Search
  37. Trades Council v. Garmon
    Search
  38. See Pugh v. See's
    Search
  39. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction
    Search
  40. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Thompson
    Search
  41. See Youngman v. Nevada
    Search
  42. Cook v. Georgetown
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial