Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Perry Vs. Thomas

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jun 15, 1987

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

32 entries 3 linked 29 unlinked
Show
  1. Southland Corp. Vs. Keating US Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1984
  2. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Vs. Byrd US Supreme Court · Mar 04, 1985
  3. Wilko Vs. Swan US Supreme Court · Dec 07, 1953
  4. U.S. 483 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court Perry v. Thomas
    Search
  5. U.S. 483 (1987) Perry v. Thomas
    Search
  6. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
    Search
  7. agreement to arbitrate. He relied principally on this Court's decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
    Search
  8. Thomas v. Kidder
    Search
  9. of the Act was not at issue in that case. In an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeal affirmed. Thomas v. Perry
    Search
  10. the Court of Appeal also rejected appellants' argument, based on this Court's decision in Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. Byrd
    Search
  11. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury
    Search
  12. cl. 3, this body of substantive law is enforceable in both state and federal courts. Southland Corp. v. Keating
    Search
  13. American Express Inc. v. McMahon
    Search
  14. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler
    Search
  15. and entered a final order dismissing Kidder, Peabody's petition in the parallel proceeding. Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Thomas
    Search
  16. Having concluded that this Court's decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
    Search
  17. Drayer v. Krasner
    Search
  18. See Southland Corp. v. Keating
    Search
  19. First among the decisions cited in footnote 15 was Wilko v. Swan
    Search
  20. was invalid. No federal preemption question was presented. Only the unexplained citation to Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood
    Search
  21. in state substantive law which a federal court sitting in diversity was bound to follow under the rule of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  22. to arbitrate is valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, as a matter of federal law, see Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury
    Search
  23. dissenting. Despite the striking similarity between this case and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
    Search
  24. rewritten the statute to give it a preemptive scope that Congress certainly did not intend. See Southland Corp. v. Keating
    Search
  25. of appellee's claim for wages despite clear state policy to the contrary. This Court held in Southland Corp. v. Keating
    Search
  26. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Ware
    Search
  27. U.S. Supreme Court Perry v. Thomas
    Search
  28. Thomas v. Perry
    Search
  29. Kidder, Peabody & Co. v. Thomas
    Search
  30. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood
    Search
  31. of Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins
    Search
  32. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ware
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial