Citation network
New York Vs. Burger
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jun 19, 1987
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
U.S. 691 (1987) U.S. Supreme Court New York v. BurgerSearch
-
U.S. 691 (1987) New York v. BurgerSearch
-
allowing government officials to ensure that such rules are followed -- and through penal sanctions. Cf. United States v. BiswellSearch
-
When respondent moved for reconsideration in light of a recent decision of the Appellate Division, People v. PaceSearch
-
on unreasonable searches and seizures is applicable to commercial premises, as well as to private homes. See v. CitySearch
-
has an expectation of privacy in commercial property, which society is prepared to consider to be reasonable, see Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
evidence but also with respect to administrative inspections designed to enforce regulatory statutes. See Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
premises, however, is different from, and indeed less than, a similar expectation in an individual's home. See Donovan v. DeweySearch
-
industries. The Court observed in Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
Certain industries have such a history of government oversight that no reasonable expectation of privacy, see Katz v. UnitedSearch
-
Ibid. In Colonnade Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
Id. at 397 U. S. 77 . We returned to this issue in United States v. BiswellSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
industry, has received renewed emphasis in more recent decisions. In Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
industry. Donovan v. DeweySearch
-
supra. Indeed, in Donovan v. DeweySearch
-
which fulfill the traditional Fourth Amendment standard of reasonableness for a government search, see O'Connor v. OrtegaSearch
-
New Jersey v. T.LSearch
-
government interest that informs the regulatory scheme pursuant to which the inspection is made. See Donovan v. DeweySearch
-
Colonnade Corp. v. UnitedSearch
-
to the law and has a properly defined scope, and it must limit the discretion of the inspecting officers. See Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
People v. TinnenySearch
-
In this respect, we see no difference between these inspections and those approved by the Court in United States v. BiswellSearch
-
and Donovan v. DeweySearch
-
U.S. at 406 U. S. 316 . See also Donovan v. DeweySearch
-
do not constitute discretionary acts by a government official, but are conducted pursuant to statute. See Marshall v. Barlow'sSearch
-
of the inspection is limited, United States v. BiswellSearch
-
at 406 U. S. 315 , to place appropriate restraints upon the discretion of the inspecting officers. See Donovan v. DeweySearch
-
laws, a major emphasis of which is the punishment of individuals for specific acts of behavior. In United States v. BiswellSearch
-
it, an inspecting officer may discover evidence of crimes, besides violations of the scheme itself. In United States v. BiswellSearch
-
administrative inspection does not render that search illegal, or the administrative scheme suspect. Cf. United States v. Villamonte-MarguezSearch
-
the States the burden of requiring the enforcement of their regulatory statutes to be carried out by specialized agents. v. AccordinglySearch
-
In People v. PaceSearch
-
of the constitutionality of the statute and charter was squarely presented by this case, as it had not been in People v. PaceSearch
-
Courts have upheld such statutes against federal constitutional attack. See, e.g., Bionic Auto Parts & Sales, Inc. v. FahnerSearch
-
People v. EasleySearch
-
Moore v. StateSearch
-
People v. BarnesSearch
-
State v. ZinmeisterSearch
-
State v. TindellSearch
-
Shirley v. CommonwealthSearch
-
Va. 49, 57-58, 235 S.E.2d 432, 436-437 (1977). But see People v. KrullSearch
-
State v. GalioSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court New York v. BurgerSearch
-
Cf. United States v. BiswellSearch
-
of the Appellate Division, People v. PaceSearch
-
See v. CitySearch
-
Katz v. UnitedSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial